Stochastic Selfish Routing
- 1.1k Downloads
We embark on an agenda to investigate how stochastic delays and risk aversion transform traditional models of routing games and the corresponding equilibrium concepts. Moving from deterministic to stochastic delays with risk-averse players introduces nonconvexities that make the network game more difficult to analyze even if one assumes that the variability of delays is exogenous. (For example, even computing players’ best responses has an unknown complexity .) This paper focuses on equilibrium existence and characterization in the different settings of atomic vs. nonatomic players and exogenous vs. endogenous factors causing the variability of edge delays. We also show that succinct representations of equilibria always exist even though the game is non-additive, i.e., the cost along a path is not a sum of costs over edges of the path as is typically assumed in selfish routing problems. Finally, we investigate the inefficiencies resulting from the stochastic nature of delays. We prove that under exogenous stochastic delays, the price of anarchy is exactly the same as in the corresponding game with deterministic delays. This implies that the stochastic delays and players’ risk aversion do not further degrade a system in the worst-case more than the selfishness of players.
KeywordsNon-additive nonatomic congestion game stochastic Nash equilibrium stochastic Wardrop equilibrium risk aversion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Beckmann, M.J., McGuire, C.B., Winsten, C.B.: Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven (1956)Google Scholar
- 9.Correa, J.R., Stier-Moses, N.E.: Wardrop equilibria. In: Cochran, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley, Chichester (2011)Google Scholar
- 15.Langer, G.: Traffic in the united states. ABC News, February 13 (2005)Google Scholar
- 23.Nikolova, E.: Strategic algorithms. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (2009)Google Scholar
- 25.Nikolova, E., Brand, M., Karger, D.R.: Optimal route planning under uncertainty. In: Long, D., Smith, S.F., Borrajo, D., McCluskey, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning & Scheduling (ICAPS), Cumbria, England, pp. 131–141 (2006)Google Scholar
- 30.Pigou, A.C.: The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London (1920)Google Scholar
- 32.Schrank, D., Lomax, T., Turner, S.: Annual urban mobility report (2010), Texas Transportation Institute, http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums
- 33.Sheffi, Y.: Urban Transportation Networks. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)Google Scholar
- 37.Wardrop, J.G.: Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II, vol. 1, pp. 325–378 (1952)Google Scholar