Peer Effects and Stability in Matching Markets
Many-to-one matching markets exist in numerous different forms, such as college admissions, matching medical interns to hospitals for residencies, assigning housing to college students, and the classic firms and workers market. In all these markets, externalities such as complementarities and peer effects severely complicate the preference ordering of each agent. Further, research has shown that externalities lead to serious problems for market stability and for developing efficient algorithms to find stable matchings. In this paper we make the observation that peer effects are often the result of underlying social connections, and we explore a formulation of the many-to-one matching market where peer effects are derived from an underlying social network. The key feature of our model is that it captures peer effects and complementarities using utility functions, rather than traditional preference ordering. With this model and considering a weaker notion of stability, namely two-sided exchange stability, we prove that stable matchings always exist and characterize the set of stable matchings in terms of social welfare. To characterize the efficiency of matching markets with externalities, we provide general bounds on how far the welfare of the worst-case stable matching can be from the welfare of the optimal matching, and find that the structure of the social network (e.g. how well clustered the network is) plays a large role.
KeywordsExpense Resi Nash
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Baccara, M., Imrohoroglu, A., Wilson, A., Yariv, L.: A field study on matching with network externalities, Working paper (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Bajari, P., Fox, J.: Measuring the efficiency of an fcc spectrum auction. Working Paper 11671, National Bureau of Economic Research (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Bodine-Baron, E., Lee, C., Chong, A., Hassibi, B.: A Wierman. Matching with friends: stability and peer effects in housing assignment, working paper, available on arxiv (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Brânzei, S., Larson, K.: Coalitional affinity games and the stability gap. In: IJCAI, pp. 1319–1320 (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Fox, J.: Estimating matching games with transfers, Working paper (2010)Google Scholar
- 22.Pycia, M.: Many-to-one matching with complementarities and peer effects, Working paper (2007)Google Scholar
- 24.Revilla, P.: Many-to-one matching when colleagues matter, Working paper (2004)Google Scholar