Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risiken der pflanzlichen Gentechnik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gentechnik bei Pflanzen

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Abstract

Die Verwendung von transgenen Pflanzen ist insbesondere in der deutschen und europäischen Öffentlichkeit sehr umstritten und findet z. T. sogar breite Ablehnung Dies steht im deutlichen Widerspruch zur Meinung der meisten Fachwissenschaftler. Wie schon an anderer Stelle ausgeführt, besteht hier offenbar ein Kommunikations- und Vertrauensproblem. Der Begriff „Risiko“, der von „risicare = etwas wagen“ stammt, wurde von der WHO 2000 wie folgt definiert: „Wahrscheinlichkeit für das Auftreten einer adversen Wirkung unter spezifizierten Umständen“. Eine andere Beschreibung ist die „Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Gefährdung“. In der öffentlichen Debatte geht es in der Regel um die Problematik, dass die Beurteilung des Risikos transgener Organismen von Fachwissenschaftlern und Laien fast immer sehr unterschiedlich ausfällt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturhinweise

  • Bartsch D, Devos Y, Hails R, Kiss J, Krogh PH, Mestdagh S, Nuti M, Sessitsch A, Sweet J, Gathmann A (2011) Environmental impact of genetically modified maize expressing Cry1 protein. In: Kempken F, Jung C (eds) Genetic Modification of Plants – Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 575–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt P (1999) Anwendung der „Grünen Gentechnik“ ohne ökologische Risiken? Biologie Unserer Zeit 29: 151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes G, Barfoot P (2004) GM crops: The global economic and environmental impact. The first nine years 1996–2004. J Agro Biotechnol Management Economics 8,15 AgBioForum; http://www.agbioforum.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun IJ, LeGall G, Elliot KA, Mellon FA, Michael AJ (2006) Shall I compare thee to a GM potato? Trends Genet 22: 525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BW, Phillips TA, Coats JR (2005) Environmental fate and effects of Bacillus thuringensis (Bt) proteins from transgenic crops: a review. J Agric Food Chem 53: 4643–4653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II: Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J 33: 19–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMG (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nature Biotech 20: 567–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotech 20: 581–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenbach C, Rinker A, Windhorst D, Windhorst W (2008) Cause effect chains on potential GMO cropping in Schleswig Holstein. In: Brechling B, Reuter H, Verhoeven R (eds) Implications of GM-crop cultivation at large spatial scales. Theorie in der Ökologie 14, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Goy PA, Duesing JH (1995) From pots to plots: Genetically modified plants on trial. Biotechnol 13: 454–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KL, Raybould AF, Hudson MD, Poppy GM (2006) How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? Trends Plant Sci 12: 1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrman S (1999) GM backlash leaves US farmers wondering how to sell their crops. Nature 401: 107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie D (1999) Red flag for a green spray. New Sci 2188: 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvier M, McCreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P (2007) A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 316: 1475–1477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momma K, Hashimoto W, Ozawa S et al. (1999) Quality and safety evaluation of genetically engineered rice with soybean glycinin: Analysis of the grain composition and digestibility of glycinin in transgenic rice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63: 314–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nap JP, Metz PLJ, Escaler M, Conner AJ (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part I. Overview of current Status and regulations. Plant J 33: 1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen MD (2011) Herbicide resistance. In: Kempken F, Jung C (eds) Genetic Modification of Plants – Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen MD, Young BG, Shaw DR, Wilson RG, Jordan DL, Dixon PM, Weller SC (2011) Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant crop systems in the United States. Part 2: Perspectives. Pest Manag Sci 67: 747–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeilstetter E, Matzk A, Schiemann J, Feldmann SD (1998) Untersuchungen zum Auskreuzverhalten von Liberty-tolerantem Winterraps auf nicht-transgenen Raps. In: Schiemann (Hrsg) Freisetzungsbegleitende Sicherheitsforschung mit gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen und Mikroorganismen. BEO, Braunschweig, S l75–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher CD, Obrycki JJ, Rice ME, Lewis LC (1997) Premaginal development, survival and field abundance of insect predators on transgenic Bacillus thuringensis com. Environmental Entomology 26: 446–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott VE, Campbell PM, Moore A et al. (2005) Transgenic expression of bean a-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J Agric Food Chem 53: 9023–9030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricroch A, Bergé JB, Kuntz M (2010) Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified? Transgenic Res 19: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999) Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402: 480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler TH, Poppy GM, Kerry BR, Denholm I (1999) Potential side effects of insect-resistant transgenic plants on arthropod natural enemies. Tibtech 17: 210–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DR, Owen MD, Dixon PM, Weller SC, Young BG, Wilson RG, Jordan DL (2011) Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 1: Introduction to 2006–2008. Pest Manag Sci 67: 741–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton AM, Roush RT (1999) False reports and the ears of men. Nature Biotechnol 17: 832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnoff N (1998) Plant resistance to environmental stress. Curr Opin Biotechnol 9: 214–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syvanen M (1999) In search of horizontal gene transfer. Nature Biotechnol 17: 833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thaca NY, Jorgensen RB, Hauser T, Mikkelsen TR, Ästergärd H (1996) Transfer of engineered genes from crop to wild plants. Trends Plant Sci 1: 356–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas A (1999) Gene flow and GM questions. Trends Plant Sci 4: 339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel W, Blum S, Meier P (1998) DNA-Entlassung aus transgenen Zuckerrüben während der Vegetations- und Überwinterungsphase und horizontaler Gentransfer im Boden. In: Schiemann (Hrsg) Freisetzungsbegleitende Sicherheitsforschung mit gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen und Mikroorganismen. BEO, Braunschweig, S 111–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botanisches Institut, Universität Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, Kiel, 24098, Germany

    Frank Kempken

  2. Langstücken 4, Mielkendorf, 24247, Germany

    Renate Kempken

Authors
  1. Frank Kempken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renate Kempken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Kempken .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kempken, F., Kempken, R. (2012). Risiken der pflanzlichen Gentechnik. In: Gentechnik bei Pflanzen. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24818-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation