Skip to main content

Governance Mechanisms as Substitutes and Complements – A Dynamic Perspective on the Interplay between Contractual and Relational Governance

  • Conference paper
New Studies in Global IT and Business Service Outsourcing (Global Sourcing 2011)

Abstract

In recent years scholars have discussed the relationship between contractual and relational governance in information systems (IS) outsourcing. Findings regarding this relationship are still mixed. Some hint at a substitutional relationship, others at a complementary relationship. Moreover novel investigations favor another argument: relational and contractual governance mechanisms can simultaneously be complements and substitutes.

If governance mechanisms can be both, substitutes and complements, the question arises whether the relationship between different types of governance mechanisms is the outcome of distinct processes of interaction. To answer this question we conducted an exploratory, multiple-case study of five IS outsourcing projects at a leading global bank. We identified four archetypical interaction processes (archetypes): Three archetypes yield complementary relationships, one yields a substitutional relationship. Based on these findings, we searched for patterns in the occurrence of the archetypes as well as for their underlying reasons.

Our analysis revealed three salient patterns in the occurrence of the archetypes, each representing a sequence of archetypes: In the first two patterns sequenced archetypes reinforced each other leading to either a “success” (pattern 1) or “failure path” (pattern 2). Pattern 3 - the “interrupted path” - demonstrates how a success path is broken and turned into a failure path induced by an external stimulating event.

Our major contribution is a shift in perspective. We show that the relationship between governance mechanisms is not static but dynamic. Dynamic interactions between governance mechanisms facilitate or corroborate perceived quality of IS outsourcing governance. Our findings pave the way towards a process-theoretic view on IS outsourcing governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dibbern, J., Winkler, J., Heinzl, A.: Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India. Mis Quarterly 32(2), 333–366 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lacity, M., Khan, S., Willcocks, L.: A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18(3), 130–146 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. MaCaulay, S.: Non-Contractural Relations in Business: A Prelimnary Study. American Sociological Review 28(1), 55–67 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poppo, L., Zenger, T.: Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23, 707–725 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H., Nam, K.: The Role of Service Level Agreement in relational Management of Information Technology Outsourcing: An Empirical Study. Mis Quarterly 33(1), 119–145 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein-Woolthuis, R., Hillebrand, B., Nooteboom, B.: Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies 26(6), 813 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mellewigt, T., Madhok, A., Weibel, A.: Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships—substitutes and complements. Managerial and Decision Economics 28(8), 833–847 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tiwana, A.: Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls. Journal of Management Information Systems 27(2), 87–126 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, Y., Cavusgil, S.: Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance. Journal of Business Research 59(8), 896–905 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Möllering, G.: The trust/control duality. International sociology 20(3), 283 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson, W.: Dualism, duality and the complexity of economic institutions. International Journal of Social Economics 26(4), 545–558 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reed, M.I.: Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis. Organization Studies, vol. 22(2), p. 201. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bachmann, R.: Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies 22(2), 337–365 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larson, A.: Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(1), 76–104 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ring, P.S., Van de Ven, A.H.: Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19(1), 90 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miles, M., Huberman, A.: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yin, R.: Case study research, Thousand Oaks, California (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 11(3), 369 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., Koenig, R.: Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations. American Sociological Review 41(2), 322 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kirsch, L.: Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research 8(3), 215 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inkpen, A.C., Currall, S.C.: The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures. Organization Science 15(5), 586–599 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rustagi, S., King, W., Kirsch, L.: Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Information Systems Research 19(2), 126 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations. Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkins, A., Ouchi, W.: Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 28(3), 468–481 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer, T.A., Huber, T.L., Dibbern, J.: Contractual And Relational Governance As Substitutes And Complements - Explaining The Development Of Different Relationships. In: ECIS Proceedings 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G.: Perspective—Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science 20(3), 635–652 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kale, P., Singh, H., Perlmutter, H.: Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital. Strategic Management Journal 21, 217 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Explaining development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 510–540 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Poppo, L., Zenger, T.: Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23(8), 707–725 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., Koch, J.: Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. The Academy of Management Review (AMR) 34(4), 689–709 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huber, T.L., Fischer, T.A., Dibbern, J. (2011). Governance Mechanisms as Substitutes and Complements – A Dynamic Perspective on the Interplay between Contractual and Relational Governance. In: Kotlarsky, J., Willcocks, L.P., Oshri, I. (eds) New Studies in Global IT and Business Service Outsourcing. Global Sourcing 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 91. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24815-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24815-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24814-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24815-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics