Service Oriented Middleware for the Internet of Things: A Perspective

(Invited Paper)
  • Thiago Teixeira
  • Sara Hachem
  • Valérie Issarny
  • Nikolaos Georgantas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6994)


The Internet of Things plays a central role in the foreseen shift of the Internet to the Future Internet, as it incarnates the drastic expansion of the Internet network with non-classical ICT devices. It will further be a major source of evolution of usage, due to the penetration in the user’s life. As such, we envision that the Internet of Things will cooperate with the Internet of Services to provide users with services that are aware of their surrounding environment. The supporting service-oriented middleware shall then abstract the functionalities of Things as services as well as provide the needed interoperability and flexibility, through a loose coupling of components and composition of services. Still, core functionalities of the middleware, namely service discovery and composition, need to be revisited to meet the challenges posed by the Internet of Things. Challenges in particular relate to the ultra large scale, heterogeneity and dynamics of the Internet of Things that are far beyond the ones of today’s Internet of Services. In addition, new challenges also arise, pertaining to the physical-world aspect that is central to the IoT. In this paper, we survey the major challenges posed to service-oriented middleware towards sustaining a service-based Internet of Things, together with related state of the art. We then concentrate on the specific solutions that we are investigating within the INRIA ARLES project team as part of the CHOReOS European project, discussing new approaches to overcome the challenges particular to the Internet of Things.


Service Composition Service Discovery Loose Coupling Discovery Module Pervasive Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zhang, W., Hansen, K.: An evaluation of the NSGA-II and MOCell genetic algorithms for self-management planning in a pervasive service middleware. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp. 192–201 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eisenhauer, M., Rosengren, P., Antolin, P.: Hydra: A development platform for integrating wireless devices and sensors into ambient intelligence systems. The Internet of Things, 367–373 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, W., Hansen, K.: Semantic web based self-management for a pervasive service middleware. In: Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 245–254 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Presser, M., Barnaghi, P., Eurich, M., Villalonga, C.: The SENSEI project: Integrating the physical world with the digital world of the network of the future. IEEE Communications Magazine 47(4), 1–4 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Karnouskos, S., Spiess, P., Savio, D.: Interacting with the SOA-Based internet of things: Discovery, query, selection, and on-demand provisioning of Web Services. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 3(3), 223–235 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CoBIs project, Cobis final project report deliverable 104 v 2.0, Tech. Rep. (2007),
  7. 7.
    Honkola, J., Laine, H., Brown, R., Tyrkko, O.: Smart-M3 information sharing platform. In: IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 1041–1046 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Massaguer, D., Hore, B., Diallo, M., Mehrotra, S., Venkatasubramanian, N.: Middleware for pervasive spaces: Balancing privacy and utility. In: Bacon, J.M., Cooper, B.F. (eds.) Middleware 2009. LNCS, vol. 5896, pp. 247–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aberer, K., Hauswirth, M., Salehi, A.: Infrastructure for data processing in large-scale interconnected sensor networks. In: International Conference on Mobile Data Management, pp. 198–205 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Masri, E., Mahmoud, Q.H.: Investigating web services on the world wide web. In: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 795–804. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu, F., Mutka, M., Ni, L.: Service discovery in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4(4), 81–90 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meshkova, E., Riihijarvi, J., Petrova, M., Mahonen, P.: A survey on resource discovery mechanisms, peer-to-peer and service discovery frameworks. Computer Networks 52(11), 2097–2128 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eid, M., Liscano, R., El Saddik, A.: A universal ontology for sensor networks data. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, pp. 59–62 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, J., Zhao, F.: Towards semantic services for sensor-rich information systems. In: 2nd International Conference on Broadband Networks, pp. 967–974 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thiago Teixeira
    • 1
  • Sara Hachem
    • 1
  • Valérie Issarny
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Georgantas
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA Paris-RocquencourtFrance

Personalised recommendations