Real-World Examples of Applied General Equilibrium Analysis

  • Manuel Alejandro Cardenete
  • Ana-Isabel Guerra
  • Ferran Sancho
Part of the Springer Texts in Business and Economics book series (STBE)


In previous chapters we have described applied general equilibrium analysis in practical terms. In this chapter we begin by presenting a succinct explanation of the history of general equilibrium and the theoretical underpinnings of this type of analysis and models. We then move on to report on actual empirical applications to give the reader a flavor of the potential of AGE modeling.


General Equilibrium Fiscal Policy Trade Policy General Equilibrium Model General Equilibrium Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alvarez, M. T. (2010). An evaluation of public policies in Spain. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Applied Economics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  2. André, F. J., Cardenete, M. A., & Velázquez, E. (2005). Performing an environmental tax reform in a regional economy. A computable general equilibrium approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 39, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. André, F. J, Cardenete, M. A., & Romero, C. (2010). Designing public policies. An approach based on multi-criteria analysis and computable general equilibrium modeling. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Vol. 642). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1951). An extension of the basic theorems of classical welfare economics. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballard, C. L., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1985). A general equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beghin, J., Roland-Holst, D., & Van der Mensbrughe, D. (2002). Trade and environment in general equilibrium: Evidence from developing economies. Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bergman, L. (2005). CGE modeling of environmental policy and resource management, Chap. 24. In K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Böhringer, C., Welsch, H., & Löschel, A. (2001). Environmental taxation and structural change in an open economy: A CGE analysis with imperfect competition and free entry. ZEW Discussion Papers 01-07, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung/Center for European Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., & Rutherford, T. (2006). Efficiency gains from “what” flexibility in climate policy and integrated CGE assessment. The Energy Journal, 27, 405–424 (special issue on Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation).Google Scholar
  11. Brouwer, R., Hofkes, M., & Linderhof, V. (2008). General equilibrium modelling of the direct and indirect economic impacts of water quality improvements in the Netherlands at national and river basin scale. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 127–140 (special issue in Integrated Hydro-Economic Modelling).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardenete, M. A., & Sancho, F. (2003). An applied general equilibrium model to assess the impact of national tax changes on a regional economy. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 15(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassel, G. (1918). The theory of social economy. New York: Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  14. Cournot, A. (1838). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. New York: Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
  15. De Melo, J. (1978). Estimating the costs of protection: A general equilibrium approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 42, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1980). The impact of trade policies on income distribution in a planning model for Colombia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (1986). The Michigan model of world production and trade: Theory and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Decaluwe, B., Patry, A., & Savard, L. (1999). When water is no longer heaven sent: Comparative pricing analysis in an AGE model. Papers 9905, Laval – Recherche en Politique Economique.Google Scholar
  19. Dervis, K. J., de Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for development policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Diao, X., & Roe, T. (2000). The Win-Win effect of joint and trade reform on interest groups in irrigated agriculture in Morocco. In A. Dinar (Ed.), The political economy of water pricing reforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Sutton, J., & Vincent, D. (1982). ORANI: A multisectoral model of the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Eaves, B. C. (1974). “Properly labelled simplexes”. Studies in optimization. MAA Studies in Mathematics, 10, 71–93.Google Scholar
  23. Eboli, F., Parrado, R., & Roson, R. (2009). Climate change feedback on economic growth: Explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model. Working Papers 2009.43, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
  24. Fargeix, A., & Sadoulet, E. (1994). A financial computable general equilibrium model for the analysis of stabilization programs. In T. Mercenier & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Applied general equilibrium and economic development. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ferreira, F. (2007). Tax reform, income distribution and poverty in Brazil: An applied general equilibrium analysis. 4th PEP Annual Meeting, Lima.Google Scholar
  26. Gómez, C. M., Tirado, D., & Rey-Maquieira, J. (2004). Water exchange versus water work: Insights from a computable general equilibrium model for the Balearic Islands. Water Resources Research, 40, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodman, D. J. (2000). More reservoirs or transfers? A computable general equilibrium analysis of projected water shortages in the Arkansas River Basin. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25(2), 698–713.Google Scholar
  28. Gossen, H. (1854). Entwicklung der Gesetze des Menschlichen Verkehrs. Berlin: Prager, 1927.Google Scholar
  29. Harberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of the corporate income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayek, F. A. (1940). Socialist calculation: The competitive solution. Economica, 7, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and capital. An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jevons, W. S. (1871). The theory of political economy. New York: Kelley and Milman, 1957.Google Scholar
  33. Johansen, L. A. (1960). A multisectorial study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  34. Kantorovitch, L. V. (1939). Mathematical methods in the organization and planning of production. Leningrad: Publication House of the Leningrad State University.Google Scholar
  35. Kehoe, T. J., & Serra-Puche, J. (1983). A computational general equilibrium model with endogenous unemployment: An analysis of the 1980 Fiscal Reform in Mexico. Journal of Public Economics, 22, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kehoe, T. J., & Whalley, J. (1985). Uniqueness of equilibrium in large-scale numerical general equilibrium models. Journal of Public Economics, 28, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keller, W. J. (1980). Tax incidence: A general equilibrium approach. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Koopmans, T. C. (1947). Computing utilization of the transportation system. Proceedings of the International Statistical Conferences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  39. Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Kremers, H., Nijkamp, P., & Wang, S. (2002). A comparison of computable general equilibrium models for analyzing climate change policies. Journal of Environmental Systems, 28, 41–65.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, H. W., & McKinnon, J. G. (1975). The sandwich method for finding fixed points. Technical Report, Department of Economics and Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
  42. Lange, O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism. The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leontief, W. (1941). The structure of American economy, 1919–1924: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, J. D. (1994). Macroeconomic stabilization and adjustment policies in a general equilibrium model with financial markets: Turkey. In T. Mercenier & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Applied general equilibrium and economic development. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mabugu, R. (2005). Fiscal policy design in South Africa: An intertemporal CGE model with perfect foresight. 4th PEP Research Network Meeting, Colombo.Google Scholar
  46. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: McMillan, 1920.Google Scholar
  47. Menger, C. (1871). Principles of economics. Glencoe: Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  48. Merril, O. H. (1971). Applications and extension of an algorithm than computer fixed points of certain non-empty convex upper semicontinous point to set of mappings. Technical Report No. 71–77, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  49. Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
  50. Narayanan, B., Hertel, T., & Horridge, M. (2009). Disaggregated data and trade policy analysis: The value of linking partial and general equilibrium models. GTAP Working Papers 3162, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette.Google Scholar
  51. Nijkamp, P., Wang, S., & Kremer, H. (2005). Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: The use of the GTAP-E model. Economic Modelling, 22, 955–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Ryan, R., De Miguel, C., Millar, S., & Munasnighe, M. (2005). Computable general equilibrium model analysis of economy-wide cross effects of social and environmental policies in Chile. Ecological Economics, 54, 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pareto, V. (1909). Manual of political economy. New York: Kelley, 1971.Google Scholar
  54. Piergiorgio, A. (2000). European and Euro-meditterranean agreements: Same simulation analysis on the effects of the EU trade policy. KITES Working Papers 110, KITES, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita’ Bocconi, Milano.Google Scholar
  55. Piggott, J. R. (1980). A general equilibrium evaluation of Australian tax policy. Doctoral thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  56. Piggott, J. R., & Whalley, J. (1977). General equilibrium investigations of U.K. tax subsidy policy: A progress report. In A. R. Nobay & M. J. Artis (Eds.), Studies in modern economic analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Robbins, L. C. (1934). The great depression. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  58. Roson, R., Bosello, F., & De Cian, E. (2007). Climate change, energy demand and market power in a general equilibrium model of the world economy. Working Papers 2007_09, Department of Economics, University of Venice “Ca’ Foscari”, Venice.Google Scholar
  59. Rutherford, T. (1998). Economic equilibrium modeling with GAMS. An introduction to GAMS/MCP and GAMS/MPSGE. Manuscript, University of Colorado, Denver.Google Scholar
  60. Rutherford, T. (1999). Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: An overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economics, 14(1–2), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rutherford, T., & Light, M. K. (2002). A general equilibrium model for tax policy in Colombia: The MEGATAX Model. Archivos de Economía, 188.Google Scholar
  62. Sancho, F. (2010). Double dividend effectiveness of energy tax policies and the elasticity of substitution. Energy Policy, 38, 2927–2932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scarf, H. (1973). The computation of economic equilibria. In collaboration with T. Hansen. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Schafer, A., & Jacoby, H. D. (2005). Technology detail in a multisector CGE Model: Transport under climate policy. Energy Economics, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Seung, C. K., Harris, T. R., MacDiarmid, R., & Shaw, W. D. (1998). Economic impacts of water reallocation: A CGE analysis for the Walker River Basin of Nevada and California. Journal of Regional Analysis Policy, 28(2), 13–34.Google Scholar
  66. Seung, C. K., Harris, T. R., Englin, J. E., & Noelwah, R. N. (2000). Impacts of water reallocation: A combined computable general equilibrium and recreation demand model approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 34, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seung-Rae, K. (2004). Uncertainty, political preferences, and stabilization: Stochastic control using dynamic CGE models. Computational Economics, 24(2), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1977). Equal yield tax alternatives: General equilibrium computational techniques. Journal of Public Economics, 8, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22(3), 1005–1051.Google Scholar
  70. Springer, K. (2003). Climate policy in a globalizing world: A CGE model with capital mobility and trade. Kiel studies. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Standardi, G. (2010). A global CGE model at the NUTS 1 Level for trade policy evaluation. Working Papers, Department of Economic Sciences, University of Verona, Verona.Google Scholar
  72. Strzepek, K. M., Yohe, G. W., Tol, R. J., & Rosegrant, M. R. (2008). General equilibrium modelling of the value of the high Aswan dam to the Egyptian economy. Ecological Economics, Special Issue in Integrated Hydro-Economic Modelling.Google Scholar
  73. Thabet, C., Macgregor, B., & Surry, Y. (1999). Effects Macro-économiques de la Politique du Prix de l‘Eau d‘Irrigation en Tunisie. Economie Rurale, 254, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner, K., Gilmartin, M., McGregor, P., & Swales, K. (2009).The added value from adopting a CGE approach to analyse changes in environmental trade balances. Working paper 0903, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde Business School, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  75. Vaittinen, R. (2004). Trade policies and integration-evaluations with CGE models. Research Reports 109, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT).Google Scholar
  76. Van der Laan, G., & Talman, A. J. (1979). A research algorithm without an artificial level for computing fixed points on unbounded regions. In Herdelberg (Ed.), Functional equations and approximations of fixed points. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Van Heerden, J., Horridge, M., & Blignaut, J.N. (2008). Integrated general equilibrium modelling of the impacts of water market instruments on the South African economy. Ecological Economics, Special Issue in Integrated Hydro Economic Modelling.Google Scholar
  78. Von Mises, L. (1920). Die Wirtschftsrechnung in Socialistischen Cemeinwesen. Archif für Socialwissenschaften, 47, translated into English and included in Collectivist Economic Planning, F. A. Hayek, London, 1935.Google Scholar
  79. Wald, A. (1936b). Uber einige Gleichungssysteme der mathematischen Okonomie. Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie, 7, 637–670. Translated as On some systems of equations of mathematical economics. Econometrica, 19, 368–403, 1951.Google Scholar
  80. Walras, L. (1874a). Principe d’une théorie mathématique de l’échange. Journal des economists, 34, 5–21.Google Scholar
  81. Walras, L. (1874b). Eléments d’economie politique pure, ou Théorie de la richesse social. Laussane: L. Corbaz. Final edition. Ed: Paris: Pichon et Durand-Auzias, 1926, reedite in 1952.Google Scholar
  82. Whalley, J. (1985). Hidden challenges in recent applied general equilibrium exercises. In J. Pigott & J. Whalley (Eds.), New developments in applied general equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Xiao, J., & Wittwer, G. (2009). Will an appreciation of the Renminbi rebalance the global economy? A dynamic financial CGE analysis. Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-192, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  84. Yusuf, A., Hartono, D., Hermawan, W., & Yayan, Y. (2008). AGEFIS: Applied general equilibrium for fiscal policy analysis. Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200807, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, Bandung.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Alejandro Cardenete
    • 1
  • Ana-Isabel Guerra
    • 1
  • Ferran Sancho
    • 2
  1. 1.University Pablo de Olavide EconomicsSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona EconomicsCerdanyola del VallèsSpain

Personalised recommendations