Cognitive Diversity in Western and Eastern Thinking

  • Riccardo Viale


The transmission of knowledge at a written or verbal level relies on various non-intentional factors. These factors, which constitute the pragmatics of the communication and understanding of knowledge, are not universal but vary with education, the cultural context, and the level and type of cultural preparation and professional expertise.


Tacit Knowledge Cognitive Style Salient Object Conversational Implicature Ulnar Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boudon, R., & Viale, R. (2000). Reasons, cognition and society. Mind & Society, 1, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiu, L.-H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and in the actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). The cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 890–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C. (2000). Information search in causal attribution: Analytic vs. holistic, Unpublished manuscript, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  6. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight=foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gopnik, A., & Choi, S. (1990). Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences? a cross-linguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language, 10, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hume, D. (1911). A treatise of human nature. In E. Rhys (Ed.), Everyman’s library. J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd/E.P. Dutton: London/New York.Google Scholar
  11. Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji, L., Su, Y., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Culture, prediction, and change. Psychological Science, 12, 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ji, L., Zhang, Z., Nisbett, R.E. (2002). Culture, language and categorization. Unpublished manuscript. Kingston, Ontario: Queens University.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, S.-H. (1974). The Use of analogy and symbolism in traditional Chinese philosophy. Journal of Chinese Psychology, 1, 313–338.Google Scholar
  16. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. Analitically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: Americans and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagashima, N. (1973). A reversed world: Or is it? In R. Horton & R. Finnegan (Eds.), Modes of thought. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  19. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Americans think differently…and why. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and point of view. In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. Analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peng, K. (1997). Naive dialecticism and its effects on reasoning and judgment about contradiction. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  23. Pozzali, A., & Viale, R. (2007). Cognition, types of “tacit knowledge” and technology transfer. In B. Walliser (Ed.), Cognitive economics: New trends. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Viale, R., Andler, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (Eds.). (2006). Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Viale, R., & Osherson, D. (2000). The diversity principle and the little scientist hypothesis. Foundations of Science, 5(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Viale, R., & Osherson, D. (2006). Cognitive development, culture, and inductive judgment. In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Viale, R., & Pozzali, A. (2007). Cognitive aspects of tacit knowledge and cultural diversity. In L. Magnani & P. Li (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science and medicine. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Watanabe, M. (1998). Styles of reasoning in Japan and the United States: Logic of education in two cultures. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  31. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., & Karp, S. A. (1954). Personality through perception. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rosselli FoundationTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations