POWDER as Enabling Technology for the Semantic Interoperability of Agricultural Repositories

  • Pythagoras Karampiperis
  • Stasinos Konstantopoulos
  • Vangelis Karkaletsis
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 240)

Abstract

Current approaches to the interoperability of heterogeneous resources typically maintain coordinated clones over which querying infrastructure operates. In the case of large-scale repositories, and especially when no single schema is clearly established so that the problem can be reduced to transforming legacy data, a more dynamic approach would be a benefit. In many real-world situation, however, useful queries need to combine information from different sources that are actively maintained in incompatible schemata and are too large to systematically clone. Examples include the various agricultural resource repositories and databases such as meteorological archives and GIS. In this position paper we explore the applicability of the W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) as infrastructure for the efficient and distributed retrieval of the meta-information needed to dynamically re-write queries in one schema to the (set of) semantically equivalent queries that need to be executed over the various heterogeneous schemata. This enables information providers to publish information in any schema as long as POWDER is used to annotate their repository with the coordination-related meta-information. Querying engines can then exploit existing and established resource discovery mechanisms implemented over the POWDER protocol to retrieve the meta-information pertinent to any single triple pattern in a query and use that to dynamically perform query rewriting.

Keywords

Single Schema Semantic Interoperability Triple Pattern Digital Repository Metadata Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Correndo, G., Salvadores, M., Millard, I., Glaser, H., Shadbolt, N.: SPARQL query rewriting for implementing data integration over linked data. In: Proc. EDBT 2010, Lausanne, March 22-26 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Duncan, C.: Digital repositories: the back-office of e-Learning or all e-Learning?. In: Proc. of ALT-C 2002, September 9-11 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Duval, E., Smith, N., Van Coillie, M.: Application profiles for learning. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 242–246 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Euzenat, J.: An infrastructure for formally ensuring interoperability in a heterogeneous semantic web. In: Cruz, et al. (eds.) The Emerging Semantic Web, Selected Papers from the 1st Semantic Web Working Symposium. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Heery, R.: Application profiles: interoperable friend or foe? In: TEL Milestone Conference, The European Library, pp. 34–39 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Holden, C.: From Local Challenges to a Global Community: Learning Repositories and the Global Learning Repositories Summit. Version 1.0. Academic ADL Co-Lab, November 11 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Manouselis, N., Najjar, J., Kastrantas, K., Salokh, G., Strack, C.M., Duval, E.: Metadata interoperability in agricultural learning repositories: An analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 70, 302–320 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pythagoras Karampiperis
    • 1
  • Stasinos Konstantopoulos
    • 1
  • Vangelis Karkaletsis
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center of Scientific Research "Demokritos"AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations