Skip to main content

Practice-Based Ontologies: A New Approach to Address the Challenges of Ontology and Knowledge Representation in History and Archaeology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 240))

Abstract

Data production in history and archaeology far outpaces data processing. In order to apply computers to this problem, historical data must be converted to machine-readable forms. This process is easy for domains of knowledge that have explicit terminology, but history and archaeology lack these characteristics. This study therefore proposes a phenomenological approach to requirements gathering for knowledge representation and ontology systems for historians and archaeologists. The approach utilizes qualitative and ethnographic research methods to gather data on practitioners’ reasoning and knowledge practices. The design requirements for ontology design can be extracted from the ‘thick description’ produced by this process, and used to build ‘practice-based ontologies.’ This paper presents the theoretical framework and early outcomes of ethnographic research with archaeologists in practice at the University of Pennsylvania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. White, H.: Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. White, H.: Interpretation in History. New Literary History 4, 281–314 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forsythe, D.E.: Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doerr, M.: Ontologies for Cultural Heritage. In: Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 463–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagoze, C.: Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 4, 169 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sowa, J.F.: The challenge of knowledge soup. In: Ramadas, J., Chunawala, S. (eds.) Research Trends in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, p. 55. Homi Bhabha Centre, Mumbai (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doerr, M.: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module - An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine 24, 75–92 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, B.: Klagges: Philosophy and Biomedical Information Systems. In: Munn, K., Smith, B. (eds.) Applied Ontology: an Introduction, pp. 21–38. Ontos Verlag, Piscataway (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasin, M., Motta, E.: Ontological requirements for annotation and navigation of philosophical resources. Synthese, 1–33 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasin, M., Motta, E., Zdrahal, Z.: Capturing knowledge about philosophy. In: 4th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 47–54. ACM, Whistler (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Little, D.: Philosophy of History (2007), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/history/

  13. Hempel, C.G.: The Function of General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy 39, 35–48 (1942)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carr, E.: What is history? Penguin, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hodder, I.: The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legg, C.: Ontologies on the Semantic Web. Ann. Rev. Info. Sci. Tech. 41, 407–451 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chomsky, N.: Language and Thought. Moyer Bell (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, R., Shrobe, H., Szolovits, P.: What is a knowledge representation? AI Magazine 14, 17 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ingarden, R.: Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, The Picture, The Architectural Work, The Film. Ohio University Press, Athens (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomasson, A.L.: Ingarden and the ontology of cultural objects. In: Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos, Frankfurt (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forsythe, D.E.: Engineering Knowledge: The Construction of Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence. Social Studies of Science 23, 445–477 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forsythe, D.E., Buchanan, B.G.: Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: some pitfalls and suggestions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19, 435–442 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forsythe, D.E.: It’s Just a Matter of Common Sense: Ethnography as Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 127–145 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pattuelli, M.C.: Modeling a domain ontology for cultural heritage resources: A user-centered approach. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. n/a (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuziemsky, C.E., Downing, G.M., Black, F.M., Lau, F.: A grounded theory guided approach to palliative care systems design. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, S141–S148 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ribes, D., Bowker, G.C.: A Learning Trajectory for Ontology Building

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ribes, D., Bowker, G.C.: Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities. Information and Organization 19, 199–217 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindlof, T.R., Taylor, B.C.: Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ramberg, B., Gjesdal, K.: Hermeneutics (2005), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutics/

  30. Wildemuth, B.M.: Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hamilton, C.: Faultlines: the construction of archaeological knowledge at Catalhoyouk. Presented at the Theoretical Archaeology Group Conference, Liverpool (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khazraee, E., Khoo, M. (2011). Practice-Based Ontologies: A New Approach to Address the Challenges of Ontology and Knowledge Representation in History and Archaeology. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 240. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24730-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24731-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics