A Bounded Confidence Approach to Understanding User Participation in Peer Production Systems

  • Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6984)


Commons-based peer production does seem to rest upon a paradox. Although users produce all contents, at the same time participation is commonly on a voluntary basis, and largely incentivized by achievement of project’s goals. This means that users have to coordinate their actions and goals, in order to keep themselves from leaving. While this situation is easily explainable for small groups of highly committed, like-minded individuals, little is known about large-scale, heterogeneous projects, such as Wikipedia.

In this contribution we present a model of peer production in a large online community. The model features a dynamic population of bounded confidence users, and an endogenous process of user departure. Using global sensitivity analysis, we identify the most important parameters affecting the lifespan of user participation. We find that the model presents two distinct regimes, and that the shift between them is governed by the bounded confidence parameter. For low values of this parameter, users depart almost immediately. For high values, however, the model produces a bimodal distribution of user lifespan. These results suggest that user participation to online communities could be explained in terms of group consensus, and provide a novel connection between models of opinion dynamics and commons-based peer production.


Gaussian Mixture Model Online Community Latin Hypercube Sampling Global Sensitivity Analysis User Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Backstrom, L., Kumar, R., Marlow, C., Novak, J., Tomkins, A.: Preferential behavior in online groups. In: WSDM 2008, pp. 1–11 (December 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T., McDonald, D.W.: Wikipedian self-governance in action: Motivating the policy lens. In: Proc. of ICWSM 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carletti, T., Fanelli, D., Guarino, A., Bagnoli, F., Guazzini, A.: Birth and death in a continuous opinion dynamics model. Eur. Phys. J. B 64(2), 285–292 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591–646 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, K., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S.: Winding stairs: A sampling tool to compute sensitivity indices. Stat. and Comp. 10, 187–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi, B., Alexander, K., Kraut, R.E., Levine, J.M.: Socialization tactics in wikipedia and their effects. In: Proc. of CSCW 2010, New York, NY, USA, pp. 107–116 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciampaglia, G.L., Vancheri, A.: Empirical analysis of user participation in online communities: the case of wikipedia. In: Proc. of ICWSM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciffolilli, A.: Phantom authority, self-selective recruitment and retention of members in virtual communities: The case of wikipedia. First Monday 8(12) (December 2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Comp. Sys. 3, 87–98 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldman, E.: Wikipedia’s labor squeeze and its consequences. Telecomm. and High Tech. Law 8, 157–184 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grabowski, A., Kosiński, R.A.: Life span in online communities. Phys. Rev. E 82(6), 066108 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence–models, analysis, and simulation. J. Art. Soc. Soc. Sim. 5(3), paper 2 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hogg, T., Lerman, K.: Stochastic models of user-contributory web sites, pp. 50–57 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansen, M., Rossing, W., Daamen, R.: Monte-Carlo Estimation Of Uncertainty Contributions From Several Independent Multivariate Sources. In: Grasman, J., van Straten, G. (eds.) Predictability And Nonlinear Modelling In Natural Sciences And Economics, pp. 334–343 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kittur, A., Kraut, R.E.: Beyond wikipedia: Coordination and conflict in online production groups, pp. 215–224 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., Kumar, R., Tomkins, A.: Microscopic evolution of social networks. In: Proc. of KDD 2008, New York, NY, USA, pp. 462–470 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, H.F., Lee, G.G.: Determinants of success for online communities: an empirical study. Behav. & Inf. Tech. 25(6), 479–488 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. Intl J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 1819–1838 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKay, M.D.: Latin hypercube sampling as a tool in uncertainty analysis of computer models. In: Proc. of WSC 1992, New York, NY, USA (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ortega, F., Izquierdo-Cortazar, D.: Survival analysis in open development projects. In: Proc. of ICSE 2009, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 7–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., Terveen, L.: Wikipedians are born, not made. In: Proc. of GROUP 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raafat, R.M., Chater, N., Frith, C.: Herding in humans. Trends in Cog. Sci. 13(10), 420–428 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rafaeli, S., Ariel, Y.: Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia. In: Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications, pp. 243–267. CUP (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M.: Sensitivity Analysis in Practice–A guide to Assessing Scientific Models. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Santner, T., Williams, B., Notz, W.: The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schroer, J., Hertel, G.: Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psych. 12(1), 96–120 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sobkowicz, P.: Modelling opinion formation with physics tools: Call for closer link with reality. J. Art. Soc. and Soc. Sim. 12(1), 11 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sobol’, I.M.: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates. Math. and Comp. in Sim. 55(1-3), 271–280 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wilkinson, D.M.: Strong regularities in online peer production. In: Proc. of EC 2008, Chicago, Illinois, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Cooperation and quality in wikipedia. In: Proc. of WikiSym 2007, Montréal, Québec, Canada, October 21-23 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang, J., Wei, X., Ackerman, M., Adamic, L.: Activity lifespan: An analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In: Proc. of ICWSM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations