The Role of Trust and ICT Proficiency in Structuring the Cross-Boundary Digital Government Research

  • Djoko Sigit Sayogo
  • Taewoo Nam
  • Jing Zhang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6984)

Abstract

This paper aims to ascertain the significant role of trust and communication in structuring the formation of digital government research collaboration. The data shows that trust has prominent role in structuring collaboration manifest in three instances of interpersonal linkages, namely: network closure, reputation, and similarity of country of origin. This study also found that multi-cultural collaboration requires communication medium for richer interpretation and discussion, including online tools. This result suggests that venturing on multi-cultural or cross-boundary collaboration requires well thought-out and carefully planned approach with closeness, interaction, and trust emerge as the major considerations.

Keywords

Scientific Collaboration Virtual Team Network Closure Team Formation Online Collaboration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, J.D., Black, G.C., Clemmons, J.R., Stephan, P.E.: Scientific Teams and Insti-tutional Collaborations: Evidence from US Universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy 34(3), 259–285 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dawes, S.S., Gharawi, M., Burke, B.: Knowledge and Information Sharing in Transnational Knowledge Network: A Contextual Perspective. In: 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, W.W., Levin, S.G., Stephan, P.E., Winkler, A.E.: The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists’ Productivity and Collaboration Patterns. Management Science 56(9), 1436 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eglene, O., Dawes, S.S.: Challenges and Strategies for Conducting International Public Management Research. Administration & Society 38(5), 596 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J.: Some Consequences of E-Mail vs. Face-To-Face Communication in Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35(3), 389–403 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B.: Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange In A Networked Organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(12), 1101–1114, 389–403Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanawattanachai, P., Yoo, Y.: Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 187–213 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis, J.D., Weigert, A.: Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces 63(4), 967 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim, L., Firkola, P.: Methodological issues in cross-cultural management research: Problems, solutions, and proposals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17(1), 133–154 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark, N.P.: Culture and Competition: Homophily and Distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches. American Sociological Review 68(3), 319–345 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McAllister, D.: Affect- and Cognitive-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 24–59 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E., Kramer, R.M.: Swift, Trust and Temporary Groups. In: Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R. (eds.) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 166–195. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller, M., Cowan, R., Duysters, G., Jonard, N.: Knowledge Structures. Working Papers of BETA (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nicholson, C.Y., Compeau, L.D., Sethi, R.: The Role of Interpersonal Liking in Building Trust in Long-Term Channel Relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(1), 3–15 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen, B.B.: The Role of Trust in Collaborative Relationships: A Multi-Dimensional Approach. Management 7(3), 239–256 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rethemeyer, R.K.: Making Sense of Collaboration and Governance: Issues and Challenges. Public Performance & Management Review 32(4), 565–573 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust – Introduction to Special Topic Forum. Academy of Management Review 23(3), 393–404 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scholl, H.: Profiling the EG Research Community and Its Core. Electronic Government, 1–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ulbrich, S., Troitzsch, H., van den Anker, F., Plüss, A., Huber, C.: Collaborative Capability of Teams in Network Organizations. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Paraskakis, I., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 307, pp. 149–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walter, J., Lechner, C., Kellermanns, F.W.: Knowledge Transfer Between and Within Alliance Partners: Private versus Collective Benefits of Social Capital. Journal of Business Research 60(7), 698–710 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wasko, M., Faraj, S., Teigland, R.: Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(11-12), 493–513 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Djoko Sigit Sayogo
    • 1
  • Taewoo Nam
    • 1
  • Jing Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Technology in GovernmentUniversity at Albany-SUNYAlbany, New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations