Simple Blade Design

  • Meinhard T. Schobeiri


Flow deflection in turbomachines is established by stator and rotor blades with prescribed geometry that includes inlet and exit camber angles, stagger angle, camber line, and thickness distribution. The blade geometry is adjusted to the stage velocity diagram which is designed for specific turbine or compressor flow applications. Simple blade design methods are available in the open literature (see References). More sophisticated and high efficiency blade designs developed by engine manufacturers are generally not available to the public. An earlier theoretical approach by Joukowsky [1] uses the method of conformal transformation to obtain cambered profiles that can generate lift force. The mathematical limitations of the conformal transformation do not allow modifications of a cambered profile to produce the desired pressure distribution required by a turbine or a compressor blade design. In the following, a simple method is presented that is equally applicable for designing compressor and turbine blades. The method is based on (a) constructing the blade camber line and (b) superimposing a predefined base profile on the camber line. With regard to generating a base profile, the conformal transformation can be used to produce useful profiles for superposition purposes. A brief description of the Joukowsky transformation explains the methodology of symmetric and a-symmetric (Cambered) profiles. The transformation uses the complex analysis which is a powerful tool to deal with the potential theory in general and the potential flow in particular. It is found in almost every fluid mechanics textbook that has a chapter dealing with potential flow. While they all share the same underlying mathematics, the style of describing the subject to engineering students differ. A very compact and precise description of this subject matter is found in an excellent textbook by Spurk [2].


Conformal Transformation Suction Surface Blade Profile Blade Design Stagger Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Joukowsky, N.E.: Vortex Theory of Screw Propeller. I-IV, I-III, The forth paper published in the Transactions of the Office for Aerodynamic Calculations and Essays of the Superior Technical School of Moscow (in Russian). Also published in Gauthier-Villars et Cie (eds). Théorie Tourbillonnaire de l’Hélice Propulsive, Quatrième Mémoire. 123–146: Paris, in French (1918)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spurk, J.H.: Fluid Mechanics. Springer, New York (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NASA SP-36 NASA Report (1965)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cumpsty, N.A.: Compressor Aerodynamics. Longman Group, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hobson, D.E.: Shock Free Transonic Flow in Turbomachinery cascade. Ph.D-Thesis, Cambridge University Report CUED/A Turbo/65 (1979)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt, J.F.: Redesign and Cascade tests of a Supercritical Controlled Diffusion stator Blade Section. AIAA Paper 84-1207Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lakschminarayana, B.: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer of Turbomachinery. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schobeiri, M.T.: A New Shock Loss Model for Transonic and Supersonic Axial Compressors With Curved Blades. AIAA, Journal of Propulsion and Power 14(4), 470–478 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teufelberger, A.: Choice of an optimum blade profile for steam turbines. Rev. Brown Boveri 2, 126–128 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobayashi, K., Honjo, M., Tashiro, H., Nagayama, T.: Verification of flow pattern for three-dimensional-designed blades. ImechE paper C423/0l5 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, M., Ulm, W.: Modern blade design for improving steam turbine efficiency. VDI Ber, 1185 (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emunds, R., Jennions, I.K., Bohn, D., Gier, J.: The computation of adjacent blade-row effects in a 1.5 stage axial flow turbine. ASME paper 97-GT-81, Orlando, Florida (June 1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunavant, J.C., Erwin, J.R.: Investigation of a Related Series of Turbine-blade Profiles in Cascade. NACA TN-3802 (1956)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerald, F.: Curves and Surfaces for Computer-aided Geometric Design, 4th edn. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Amsterdam (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bauer, F., Garabedian, P., Korn, D.: Supercritical Wing Sections III. Springer, New York (1977)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dang, T., Damle, S., Qiu, X.: Euler-Based Inverse Method for Turbomachine Blades: Part II—Three Dimensions. AIAA Journal 38(11) (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Medd, A.J.: Enhanced Inverse Design Code and Development of Design Strategies for Transonic Compressor Blading. Ph.D. dissertation, Department ofMechanical Engineering, Syracuse University (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations