Advertisement

On Explicandum versus Explicatum

  • Settimo Termini
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 273)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold. First of all I want to present some old ideas revisited in the light of some of the many interesting new developments occurred in the course of these last ten years in the field of the foundations of fuzziness. Secondly I desire to present a tentative general framework in which it is possible to compare different attitudes and different approaches to the clarification of the conceptual problems arising from fuzziness and soft computing. In the paper, then, I shall use some names as banners to indicate a (crucial) problem (i.e., Carnap’s problem, von Neumann’s problem, Galileian science, Aristotelian science and so on). As it will be clear by reading the paper, the association of a name to a certain problem should not be considered as the result of a historically based profound investigation but only as a sort of slogan for a specific position and point of view. It is well known that Rudolf Carnap in the first pages of his Logical foundations of probability faced the (difficult) problem of the ways and procedures according to which a prescientific concept (which by its very nature is inexact) is trasformed into a (new) exact scientific concept. He called this transformation (the transition from the explicandum, the informal, qualitative, inexact prescientific notion to the explicatum, its scientific, quantitative, exact substitute) the procedure of explication, a procedure which, as Carnap immediately observed, presents a paradoxical aspect. While in ordinary scientific problems, he, in fact, observes, “both the datum and the solution are, under favorable conditions, formulated in exact terms ... in a problem of explication the datum, viz., the explicandum, is not given in exact terms; if it were, no explication would be necessary. Since the datum is inexact, the problem itself is not stated in exact terms; and yet we are asked to give an exact solution. This is one of the puzzling peculiarities of explication”. One of the leading ideas of the paper will be to use the distinction made by Carnap between “explicandum” and “explicatum” to analyze a few conceptual questions arising in Fuzzy Set Theory (and Soft Computing).

Keywords

Soft Computing Logical Principle Vague Predicate Exact Term Informal Notion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alsina, C., Trillas, E., Valverde, L.: On Some Logical Connectives for Fuzzy Sets Theory. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 93, 15–26 (1983)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carnap, R.: Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago University Press (1950)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebanks, B.R.: On Measures of Fuzziness and their Representations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 94, 24–37 (1983)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Heijenoort, J.: Frege and Vagueness. In: van Heijenoort, J. (ed.) Selected Essays, pp. 85–97. Bibliopolis, Naples (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lukasiewicz, J.: Philosophical remarks on many-valued systems of propositional logic. In: Borkowski, L., Lukasiewicz, J. (eds.) Selected Works. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, pp. 153–178. North-Holland Publ. Comp., Pol. Scientif. Publ., Warszawa, Amsterdam (1970)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Luca, A., Termini, S.: A definition of a non probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory. Information and Control 20, 301–312 (1972); reprinted in: Dubois, D., Prade, H., Yager, R.R. (eds.): Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems. pp. 197-202, Morgan Kaufmann (1993) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Luca, A., Termini, S.: Entropy of L-fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 24, 55–73 (1974)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Luca, A., Termini, S.: Entropy and energy measures of a fuzzy set. In: Gupta, M.M., Ragade, R.K., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, pp. 321–338. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Luca, A., Termini, S.: On Some Algebraic Aspects of the Measures of Fuzziness. In: Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E. (eds.) Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, pp. 17–24. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Luca, A., Termini, S.: Entropy Measures in Fuzzy Set Theory. In: Singh, M.G. (ed.) Systems and Control Encyclopedia, pp. 1467–1473. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    von Neumann, J.: The General and Logical Theory of Automata. In: Cerebral Mechanisms in Behaviour – The Hixon Symposium, J. Wiley, New York (1951); (reprinted in [13], pp. 288–328 )Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    von Neumann, J.: Probabilistic Logics and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms from Unreliable Components. In: Shannon, C.E., MacCarthy, J. (eds.) Automata Studies. Princeton University Press (1956); (reprinted in [13] pp. 329–378 )Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    von Neumann, J.: Design of Computers, Theory of Automata and Numerical Analysis. In: Collected Works, vol. V. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1961)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seising, R.: The Fuzzification of Systems. The Genesis of Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Initial Applications – Its Development to the 1970s. STUDFUZZ, vol. 216. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seising, R. (ed.): Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives. Philosophy and Logic, Criticisms and Applications. STUDFUZZ, vol. 243. Springer, Berlin (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Skala, H.J., Settimo, T., Trillas, E.: Aspects of Vagueness. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Terricabras, J.-M., Trillas, E.: Some remarks on vague predicates. Theoria 10, 1–12 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Termini, S.: Aspects of Vagueness and Some Problems of their Formalization. In: [16], pp. 205–230Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Termini, S.: Vagueness in Scientific Theories. In: Singh, M.G. (ed.) Systems and Control Encyclopedia, pp. 4993–4996. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Termini, S.: Vague Predicates and the Traditional Foundations of Mathematics. In: International Congress for Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, Salzburg (1983)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Termini, S.: Remarks on the development of Cybernetics. Scientiae Matematicae Japonicae 64(2), 461–468 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Termini, S.: On some vagaries of vagueness and information. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 35, 343–355 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Termini, S.: Imagination and Rigor: their interaction along the way to measuring fuzziness and doing other strange things. In: Termini, S. (ed.) Imagination and Rigor, pp. 157–176. Springer, Milan (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Termini, S. (ed.): Imagination and Rigor. Springer, Milan (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Termini, S.: Concepts, Theories, and Applications: the role ”experimentation” for formalizing new ideas along innovative avenues. In: Trillas, E., Bonissone, P., Magdalena, L., Kacprycz, J. (eds.) Experimentation and Theory: Hommage to Abe Mamdani. STUDFUZZ. Physica-Verlag (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Termini, S.: On some ” family resemblances” of Fuzzy Set Theory and Human Sciences. In: Seising, R., Sanz, V. (eds.) This same volumeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trillas, E.: Sobre funciones de negación en la teoría de subconjuntos difusos, Stocastica III, 47-59; an english version appeared in the volume. : Barro, S., Alberto, B., Sobrino, A. (eds.) Advances of Fuzzy Logic, pp. 31–43. Press of the Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trillas, E.: Non Contradiction, Excluded Middle, and Fuzzy Sets. In: Di Gesù, V., Pal, S.K., Petrosino, A. (eds.) WILF 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5571, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trillas, E.: Il Laboratorio/Istituto di Cibernetica e la mia vita. In: Greco, P., Termini, S. (eds.) (a cura di) Memoria e progetto, GEM, Bologna, pp. 23–32 (2010) (an english version, not published, is also available)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, H., Qiu, D.: Computing with words via Turing machines: a formal approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 11(6), 742–753 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yager, R.R.: On the Measures of Fuzziness and Negation. II Lattices. Information and Control 44, 236–260 (1980)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yager, R.R., Ovchinnikov, S., Tong, R.M., Nguyen, H.T. (eds.): Fuzzy Sets and Applications: Selected Papers by L.A. Zadeh. Wiley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yager, R.R.: On the specificity of a possibility distribution. In: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 50, pp. 279–292 (1992); Reprinted in: Dubois, D., Prade, H., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, pp. 203-216. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yager, R.R.: Measures of information in generalized constraints. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 6, 519–532 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ying, M.S.: A formal model of computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 10(5), 640–652 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Foreword to: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zadeh, L.A.: From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words – From Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 12, 307–324 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Settimo Termini
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical Computer ScienceUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations