EmotionML – An Upcoming Standard for Representing Emotions and Related States

  • Marc Schröder
  • Paolo Baggia
  • Felix Burkhardt
  • Catherine Pelachaud
  • Christian Peter
  • Enrico Zovato
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6974)

Abstract

The present paper describes the specification of Emotion Markup Language (EmotionML) 1.0, which is undergoing standardisation at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The language aims to strike a balance between practical applicability and scientific well-foundedness. We briefly review the history of the process leading to the standardisation of EmotionML. We describe the syntax of EmotionML as well as the vocabularies that are made available to describe emotions in terms of categories, dimensions, appraisals and/or action tendencies. The paper concludes with a number of relevant aspects of emotion that are not covered by the current specification.

Keywords

Action Tendency Emotion Category Markup Language Virtual Agent Incubator Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burkhardt, F., Schröder, M.: Emotion markup language: Requirements with priorities. W3C incubator group report, World Wide Web Consortium (2008), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-requirements-20080513/
  2. 2.
    Cowie, R., Cornelius, R.R.: Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech. Speech Communication 40(1-2), 5–32 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Appolloni, B., Taylor, J., Romano, A., Fellenz, W.: What a neural net needs to know about emotion words. In: Mastorakis, N. (ed.) Computational Intelligence and Applications, pp. 109–114. World Scientific & Engineering Society Press (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Savvidou, S., McMahon, E., Sawey, M., Schröder, M.: ’FEELTRACE’: an instrument for recording perceived emotion in real time. In: Proc. ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion, Northern Ireland, pp. 19–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Carolis, B., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I., Steedman, M.: APML, a markup language for believable behavior generation. In: Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) Life-Like Characters, pp. 65–85. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douglas-Cowie, E., Cowie, R., Sneddon, I., Cox, C., Lowry, O., McRorie, M., Martin, J., Devillers, L., Abrilian, S., Batliner, A., Amir, N., Karpouzis, K.: The HUMAINE database: Addressing the collection and annotation of naturalistic and induced emotional data. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 488–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekman, P.: Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In: Cole, J. (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 19, pp. 207–282. University of Nebraska Press (1972)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fontaine, J.R., Scherer, K.R., Roesch, E.B., Ellsworth, P.C.: The world of emotions is not Two-Dimensional. Psychological Science 18(12), 1050–1057 (2007), doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frijda, N.H.: The Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebhard, P.: ALMA - a layered model of affect. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), Utrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research 5(4), 269–306 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnston, M., Baggia, P., Burnett, D.C., Carter, J., Dahl, D.A., McCobb, G., Raggett, D.: EMMA: extensible MultiModal annotation markup language (February 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/emma/
  13. 13.
    Kipp, M.: Anvil - a generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In: Proc. Eurospeech, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 1367–1370 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehrabian, A.: Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology 14(4), 261–292 (1996), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02686918 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scherer, K.R.: Appraisal theory. In: Dalgleish, T., Power, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Cognition & Emotion, pp. 637–663. John Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schröder, M., Devillers, L., Karpouzis, K., Martin, J.-C., Pelachaud, C., Peter, C., Pirker, H., Schuller, B., Tao, J., Wilson, I.: What should a generic emotion markup language be able to represent? In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 440–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schröder, M., Zovato, E., Pirker, H., Peter, C., Burkhardt, F.: W3C emotion incubator group final report. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2007), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-emotion-20070710
  19. 19.
    Schröder, M., Baggia, P., Burkhardt, F., Martin, J., Pelachaud, C., Peter, C., Schuller, B., Wilson, I., Zovato, E.: Elements of an EmotionML 1.0. W3C final incubator group report, World Wide Web Consortium (2008), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-emotionml-20081120/
  20. 20.
    Schröder, M., Baggia, P., Burkhardt, F., Oltramari, A., Pelachaud, C., Peter, C., Zovato, E.: Emotion markup language (EmotionML) 1.0. W3C working draft, World Wide Web Consortium (July 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-emotionml-20100729/
  21. 21.
    Schröder, M., Baggia, P., Burkhardt, F., Pelachaud, C., Peter, C., Zovato, E.: Emotion markup language (EmotionML) 1.0. W3C Last Call Working Draft, World Wide Web Consortium (April 2011), http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-emotionml-20110407/
  22. 22.
    Schröder, M., Pelachaud, C., Ashimura, K., Baggia, P., Burkhardt, F., Oltramari, A., Peter, C., Zovato, E.: Vocabularies for EmotionML. W3C Working Draft, World Wide Web Consortium (April 2011), http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-emotion-voc-20110407/
  23. 23.
    Schröder, M., Pirker, H., Lamolle, M.: First suggestions for an emotion annotation and representation language. In: Proceedings of LREC 2006 Workshop on Corpora for Research on Emotion and Affect, Genoa, Italy, pp. 88–92 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schröder, M., Pirker, H., Lamolle, M., Burkhardt, F., Peter, C., Zovato, E.: Representing emotions and related states in technological systems. In: Petta, P., Cowie, R., Pelachaud, C. (eds.) Emotion-Oriented Systems – The Humaine Handbook, pp. 367–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Troncy, R., Mannens, E., Pfeiffer, S., van Deursen, D.: Media fragments URI 1.0. W3C last call working draft, World Wide Web Consortium (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Schröder
    • 1
  • Paolo Baggia
    • 2
  • Felix Burkhardt
    • 3
  • Catherine Pelachaud
    • 4
  • Christian Peter
    • 5
  • Enrico Zovato
    • 2
  1. 1.DFKI GmbHSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Loquendo S.p.A.TorinoItaly
  3. 3.Deutsche Telekom AGBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Telecom ParisTechParisFrance
  5. 5.Fraunhofer IGDRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations