Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC))

  • 2855 Accesses

Abstract

The finite element method (FEM) has now become recognized as a general method with wide applications in engineering and applied mechanics. FEM was originally developed in the field of structural analysis. All the problems were linear in the sense that they involve the solution of sets of linear algebraic equations. It is the linear elastic FEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1999) Effect of failure criterion used by NASA. Technical Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • An M, Yu MH and Wu X (1991) Applications of generalized twin shear yield criterion in rock mechanics. Rock and Soil Mech., 12(1): 17–26 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenbach H and Kolupaev VA (2008) Remarks on Model of Mao-Hong Yu. The Eighth International Conference on Fundamentals of Fracture (ICFF VIII), Zhang TY, Wang B and Feng XQ eds. pp 270–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anandarajah A (2010) Computational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity: Solids and Porous Media. Springer: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bai XY (2005) The Application of the Unified Strength Theory for Stability of Slope. Master’s Dissertation, Chang’an University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ (1996) Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Liu WK and Moran B (2000) Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. John Wiley, Chichester: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet J and Wood RD (1997) Non-linear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis. Cambridge University Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R (1987) Integration of plasticity equations for singular yield functions. Comput. Struct., 26: 823–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R (1989) Computational strategies for strongly curved and non-smooth yield criteria with applications to localisation atof deformion. In: Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications, Ed. by Owen, DRJ, Hinton E and Onate E, Pineridge Press Ltd., pp 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Pankaj and Bićani N (1991) A note on singularity indicators for Mohr-Coulomb type yield criteria. Computers & Structures, 39(1–2): 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebbia CA. ed. (1985) Finite Element Systems (A Handbook), Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF (1982) Plasticity in Reinforced Concrete. McGraw-Hill: New York, pp 190–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF and Baladi GY (1985) Soil Plasticity: Theory and Implementation. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF and Mizuno E (1990) Nonlinear Analysis in Soil Mechanics: Theory and Implementation. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF and Saleeb AF (1994) Constitutive Equations for Engineering Materials. Vol.1: Elasticity and Modeling, Revised edn. Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp 259–304, 462–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF et al. (1994) Constitutive Equations for Engineering Materials. Vol. 2: Plasticity and modeling. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF and Zhang H (1991) Structural Plasticity: Theory, Problems and CAE Software, Springer-Verlag, pp 125–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD, Malkus DS and Plesha ME (1989) Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, third edition, John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisfield M (1991) Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. Vol 1: Essentials John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisfield M (1996) Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. Vol 2: Advanced Topics. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisfield M (1997) Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RO and Selvadurai APS (2002) Plasticity and Geotechnics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doltsinis IS ed. (1989) Advances in Computational Nonlinear Mechanics (CISM) Springer-Verlag: Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai CS and Gioda G. eds. (1990) Numerical Methods and Constitutive Modeling in Geomechanics, Springer: Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit PM and Dixit US (2008) Modeling of Metal Forming and Machining Processes by Finite Element and Soft Computing Methods. Springer: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne FPE and Petrinic N (2005) Introduction to Computational Plasticity. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers W (1999) IUTAM Symposium on Theoretical and Numerical Methods in Continuum Mechanics of Porous Materials, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan SC and Qiang HF 2001 Normal high-velocity impaction concrete slabs-a simulation using the meshless SPH procedures. In: Computational Mechanics-New Frontiers for New Millennium, Valliappan S. and Khalili N. eds. Elsevier Science Ltd, pp 1457–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fen TG and Du B (2010) Dynamic analysis of the 500kV underground transformer substation for Shanghai World EXPO, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLAC-3D (1997) Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3-Dimensions, Version 2.0. User’s Manual, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc (US).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieman PA and Pan J (2000) Effects of plastic anisotropic and yield criteria on prediction of forming limit curves. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 42: 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV and Gioda Ged (2000) Advanced Numerical Applications and Plasticity in Geomechanics. Springer: Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haderbache L and Laouami N (2010) The effect of failure criterion on slope stability analysis. The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han W and Reddy BD (1999) Plasticity: Mathematical Theory and Numerical Analysis. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite RM (1961) Range of yield condition in ideal plasticity. J. Eng. Mech., 87: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton E and Owen DRJ (1979) An Introduction to Finite Element Computations. Pineridge Press: Swansea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopperstad OS, T. Berstad, H. Ilstad et al (1998) Effects of the yield criterion on local deformations in numerical simulation of profile forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP and Cui WC (2006) Effect of bauschinger effect and yield criterion on residual stress distribution of autofrettaged tube (Gun Tubes Conference, Oxford, 2005). Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 128(2): 212–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TRJ (1987) The Finite Element Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpheson C and Naylor DJ (1975) The importance of the form of the failure criterion. C/R/243/75, University of Wales: Swansea, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Kitagawa H and Shima S eds. (1990) Computational Plasticity. Elsevier Appl. Science: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeremic B and Sture S (1997) Implicit Integrations in Elastoplastic Geotechnics, J. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 2(2): 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremić B, Yang ZH, Chen Z et al. (2010) Lectures Notes on Computational Geomechanics: Inelastic Finite Elements for Pressure Sensitive Materials, version 2.1(University of California, Davis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AS and Huang S (1995) Continuum Theory of Plasticity, John Wiley and Sons Inc: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoei AR (2005) Computational Plasticity in Power Forming Processes. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi AS, Oh SI and Altan T (1989) Metal Forming and the Finite Element Method. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koiter WT (1953) Stress-strain relations, uniqueness and variational theorems for elastic-plastic materials with singular yield surface, Quart. Appl. Math., 11: 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojic M and Bathe KJ (2005) Inelastic Analysis of Solids and Structures. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsovos MD and Pavlovic MN (1995) Structural Concrete: Finite Element Analysis for Limit-State Design. Thomas Telford Publ: London, pp 83–103.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kou XD, Zhou WY, and Ang RQ (2001) Stability analysis on the high slopes of Three-Gorges shiplock using FA\LAC-3D. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 20(1): 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda M and Tvergaard V (2000) Forming limit diagram for anisotropic metal with different yield criteria. Int. J. Solids & Structures, 37: 5037–5059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson R and Runesson K (1996) Implicit integration and consistent linearization for yield criteria of the Mohr-Coulomb type. Mech. Cohesive-Friction Mater, 1: 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RW and Schrefler BA (1987) The Finite Element Method in the Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fen TG and Du B (2010) Dynamic analysis of the 500kV underground transformer substation for Shanghai World EXPO, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Lu XY and Zhao XW (2008) Topology optimization based on bi-directional evolutionary structure of unified strength. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 23(1): 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K and Chen GR (2010) Finite element analysis of slope stability based on slip line field theory. J. Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 38(2): 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2008) In-situ Stress Measurement and Stability Analysis Based on the Unified Strength Theory in Large Scale Underground Caverns Zone. Doctoral Dissertation, Beijing Scientific and Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y and Qiao L (2012) Stability Analysis of Underground Caverns based on the Unified Strength Theory. In: Computational Plasticity, Zhejiang University Press & Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, pp 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YM, Ishii K, Nakazato C and Shigeta T (1994) Prediction of safety rate and multi-slip direction of slip failure under complex stress state. Advances Eng. Plasticity and its Applications. Xu B.Y and Yang W eds. International Academic Publishers: Beijing, pp 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YM. and Ishii K (1998) The Evaluation of the Elasto-plastic Behavior of Composite Materials under Biaxial Stress with Homogenization Method, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Engineering and Science, 3: 1023–1026. JSCES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YM. and Ishii K (1998) The Evaluation of Strength for Composite Materials. In: Strength Theory, Application, Development and Prospects for 21st Century, Science Press: New York, pp 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang JL (2004) Fracture and Failure Mechanism of Concrete Road and its Applications. Doctoral Dissertation, Changan University, Xi’an, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang ZZ (2005) Three-Dimensional Failure Process Analysis of Rock and Associated Numerical Tests. Doctoral Dissertation, North-East University, Shenyang, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Li LY and Mei ZX (1994) Elasto-visco-plastic finite element analysis of self-enhanced thick cylinder. Chinese J. of Appl. Mechanics, 11(3): 133–137 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu GH and Wang ZY (2004) Dynamic response and blast-resistance analysis of a tunnel subjected to blast loading. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 38(2): 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma ZY and Liao HJ (2012) Unified strength theory and FLAC-3D. In: Computational Plasticity, Zhejiang University Press & Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, pp 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J.M. (1984), Stress computation in elastoplasticity, Engineering Comput., 1:42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson H, Axelsson K and Klisinski M (1999) On a constitutive driver as a useful tool in soil plasticity. Advances in Engineering Software, 30: 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi T (1985). Foundations of the numerical analysis of plasticity. North-Holland: Amsterdam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moin K and Pankaj (1998) Post-peak behavior simulation using different failure theories. Strength Theory: Applications, Developments and Prospects for the 21st Century. Yu MH and Fan SC eds. Science Press: New York, Beijing, pp 1121–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakai T and Matsuoka H (1980) In: Proceedings of Society of Japanese Civil En gineering Report, No.303, 65–77, and Matsuoka H (2001) Soil Mechanics (Chinese edition). China Hydraulic and Power Press: Beijing, p 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak GC and Zienkiewicz CC (1972) Convenient form of stress invariants for plasticity, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 4: 949–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto EAS, Periæ D and Owen D.R.J (2009) Computational Methods for Plasticity: Theory and Applications. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen MP (1991) Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity. Second Edn. CRC Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden JT (1972) Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oñate E and Owen R eds (2007) Computational Plasticity. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M and Popov EP (1985) Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations. Int. J. Numer. Methods in Eng., 21: 1561–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M, Leroy Y and Needleman A (1987) A finite element method for localized failure analysis. Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 61: 89–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M and Shih CF eds. (1994) IUTAM Symposium on Computational Mechanics and Materials. J. Modeling and Simulation in Material Sci. and Eng., 2(3A): 421–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen D.R.J and Hinton E (1980), Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice, Pineridge Press Ltd.: Swansea

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen DRJ, Hinton E and Onate E (1989) Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications. Pineridge Press Limited, pp 101, 1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen DRJ, Hinton E and Onate E (1992) Computational Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applications Pineridge Press Ltd.: Swansea

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan CS (1995) Numerical Method for Tunnel Mechanics. China Railway Engineering Press: Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan XM, Kong J, Yang Z and Liu C (2010) Secondary development and application of unified elastoplastic constitutive model to ABAQUS. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 31(4): 1092–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankaj and Bićanić N (1989) On multivector stress returns in Mohr-Coulomb plasticity. In: Second. Int. Conf. Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications, Edited by Owen D.R.J, Hinton E and Onate E. Pineridge Press: Swansea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peric D and de Souza Neto EA (1999) A new computational model for Tresca plasticity at finite strains with an optimal parametrization in the principal space. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 171(3–4), 404–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivonka P, Lackner R and Mang HA (2003) Shapes of loading surfaces of concrete models and their influence on the peak load and failure mode in structural analyses. Int. J. Engineering Science, 41(13–14): 1649–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pramono E and Willam K (1989) Implicit integration of composite yield surface with corners. Engineering Computational, 6: 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quint Co. (1993a) COMPMAT-Analysis system for composite materials. FEM codes of Quint Corporation: Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quint Co. (1993b) COMPMAT-Analysis system for composite materials. FEM codes of Quint Corporation: Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quint Co. (1994a) PREMAT/POSTMAT-Pre and Post Processor for Composite Materials. FEM Codes of Quint Corporation: Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quint Co. (1994b) STAMPS-Structural Analysis Program for Civil Engineering. FEM Codes of Quint Corporation: Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JN (1993) An Introduction to the Finite Element Method, second edition. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy BD ed. (2009) Theoretical Modelling and Computational Aspects of Inelastic Media. Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium, Cape Town, 2008. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH and Poorooshasb HB (1963) A theoretical and experimental study of strains in triaxial compression tests on normally consolidated clays. Geotechnique, 13(1):l2–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH, Schofield AN and Thurairajah A (1963) Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical. Geotechnique, 13(3): 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH and Burland JB (1968) On the generalised stress-strain behaviour of ‘wet’ clay. In: Engineering Plasticity, Cambridge Univ Press, pp535–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runesson K, Sture S, and Willam K (1988), Integration in computational plasticity. Comput. Struct, 30(1–2): 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakash A, Moondra S and Kinsey, BL. (2006) Effect of yield criterion on numerical simulation results using a stress-based failure criterion. J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 128(3): 436–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheunemann P 2004 The influence of failure criteria on strength prediction of ceramic components. J. of the European Ceramic Society, 24(8): 2181–2186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield AN and Wroth CP (1968) Critical State Soil Mechanics. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao CJ and Qian YJ (2007) Load bearing capability of concrete-filled steel tube component considering effect of intermediate principal stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24(03): 396–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao CJ, Wu YH and Qian YJ (2007) Plastic seismic damage of concrete structure based on five-parameter unified strength theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24(1): 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZJ (1993) Comparison of several yield criteria. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 14(1): 41–50 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZJ (2000) Theoretical Soil Mechanics. China Hydraulic Power Press: Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC and Hughes TJR (1998) Computational Inelasticity. Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan SW. and Booker JR (1986), Removal of singularities in Tresca and Mohr-Coulomb yield function. Comm. Appl. Num. Meth., 2: 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DL. ed. (1990) Mathematical Programming Methods in Structural Plasticity. (21 papers, 435 pages) Springer-Verlag: Wien, pp 21, 435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith IM and Griffiths DV (1998) Programming the Finite Element Method, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith IM and Griffiths DV (2004) Programming the Finite Element Method. 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strin E (1993) Progress in Computational Analysis of Inelastic Structures (CISM No.321). Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HY, Shang YQ, Zhang CS, Ying HP, Li SQ (2004) 3D numerical modeling of possible failure zone with underground excavation. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 23(13): 2192–2196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HY, Shang YQ and Zhang CS (2004) Numerical modeling analysis for surrounding rockmass stability of large underground cavities. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 38(1): 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu PP (2006) Review of “Unified strength theory and its Applications. Springer, Berlin, 2004”. Zentralblatt MATH 2006, Cited in Zbl. Reviews, 1059.74002 (02115115).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer PA (1998) PLAXIS—Finite Element Code for Soil and Rock Plasticity. Balkema: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner RH and Knibloe JR (1989) The importance of constitutive behavior to sheet forming performance. Advance in Constitutive Laws for Eng. Material. Int. Acad Publ: Beijing, pp 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Chen JK, Wang QZ et al. (2008) The New Method of Structural Reliability Analysis by Monte-Carlo Stochastic Finite Element. J. of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 40(3): 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Chen JK, Wang QZ, Li YL (2008) Structural Reliability Analysis by Monte-Carlo Based on Conditional Expectation Variance Reduction and Antithetic Variable Sampling. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 5: 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F and Fan SC (1998) Limit pressures of thick-walled tubes using different yield criteria. Strength Theory: Applications, Developments and Prospects for the 21st Century. Yu MH and Fan SC eds. Science Press: New York, Beijing, pp 1047–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (1998) Nonlinear finite element analysis of RC plate and shell using the unified strength theory. PhD thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ and Lu F (2010) Unified strength theory constitutive model embedded software ABAQUS and its application in tunnel engineering. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 27(2): 68–74 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JQ and Lu F, (2012) Implementation of the Unified Strength Theory in ABAQUS and its Application for Tunnel Engineering. In: Computational Plasticity, Zhejiang University Press & Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, pp 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L and Gao Q (2010) Underground Mining. Chapter14 in this monograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L and Lee TC (2006) The effect of yield criteria on forming limit curve prediction and deep drawing process simulation. Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46(9): 988–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich W, Stein E. and Bathe KJ. Eds (1981) Non-linear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LQ, Zhang SR (2008) Analysis on textural stress and rock failure of diversion tunnels. Chinese J. of Geotechnical Engineering, 30(6): 813–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LQ, Li YQ and Chen ZP (2008) Sudden-crack Phenomenon and Simulation of Surrounding Rock-mass in Diversion Tunnel. China Rural Water and Hydropower, (5): 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LQ, Zhang SR, Chen ZP. (2009) Adaptive arithmetic of arch dam cracking analysis. J. of Hydraulic Engineering, 40(2): 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin YQ (1984) Loading criteria for a singular yield surface (in Chinese). Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 6(2): 282–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin YQ and Zhou S (1985) Constitutive relation in the singular point of yield criterion for geomaterials. Chinese J. of Rock Mechanics and Eng, 4(1): 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu HS (2006) Plasticity and Geotechnics. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1961a) General behaviour of isotropic yield function. Res. Report of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an, China (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1961b) Plastic potential and flow rules associated singular yield criterion. Res. Report of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1983) Twin-shear yield criterion. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 25(1): 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1992) New System of Strength Theory. Xian Jiaotong University Press: Xian, China (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1994) Unified strength theory for geomaterials and its application. Chinese Journal of Geotechinal Engineering, (2): 1–10 (in Chinese, English Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (1998) Twin Shear Theory and Its Applications. The Science Press: Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH (2004) Unified Strength Theory and its Applications. Springer: Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and He LN (1991) A new model and theory on yield and failure of materials under complex stress state. In: Mechanical Behavior of Materials-6, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press: Oxford, pp 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and Li YM (1991) Twin shear constitutive theory and its computational implementation. In: Computational Mechanics, Ed. by Cheung YK, Lee JHW and Leung AYT, Balkema: Rotterdam, pp 875–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and Meng XM (1992) Twin shear elasto-plastic model and its application in geotechnical engineering. Chinese J. Geotech. Eng., 14(3): 71–75 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, He LN and Zeng WB (1992) A new unified yield function: Its model, computational implementation and engineering application. Computational Methods in Engineering: Advances and Applications. Tay AAO and Lam KY eds. World Scientific: Singapore, pp 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and Meng XM (1993) Researches in the stability of ancient city wall in Xi’an (in English). Researches in the City Wall in Xi’an. Yu MH, Zhang XP and Fang TP eds. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press: Xi’an, China, pp 168–174 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Meng XM and Xie S (1993) Researches in the protection and utilization of ancient city wall in Xi’an (in Chinese). Researches in the City Wall in X’ian. Yu MH, Zhang XP and Fang TP eds. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press: Xi’an, China, pp 94–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH et al. (1993, 1998) UEPP User’s Manual, Version 3.0, Research Division of Structural Strength, Dept. of Civil Eng., Xi’an Jiaotong University: Xi’an, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and Zeng WB (1994) New theory of engineering structural analysis and its application. J. Eng. Mech. 11(1): 9–20 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Yang SY, Fan SC, et al (1997) Twin shear unified elasto-plastic constitutive model and its applications. Chin. J. Geotech Eng., 21(6): 9–18 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH et al. (2006) Generalized Plasticity. Springer: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Ma GW and Li JC (2009) Structural Plasticity: Limit, Shakedown and Dynamic Plastic Analyses of Structures. ZJU Press and Springer: Hangzhou and Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH and Meng XM (1992) Twin shear elasto-plastic model and its application in geotechnical engineering. Chinese J. Geotech. Eng., 14(3): 71–75 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Zeng WB (1993) Mesomechanical simulation of failure criterion for a composite material. Macro-Meso-Micro Mechanical Properties of Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuda M, Xu BY eds. Mie Academic Press: Mie, Japan, pp 571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Yang SY, Fan SC, et al. (1997) Twin shear unified elasto-plastic constitutive model and its applications. Chin. J. Geotech Eng., 21(6): 9–18 (in Chinese, English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Yang SY, Fan SC, Ma GW (1999) Unified elasto-plastic associated and non-associated constitutive model and its engineering applications. Int. J. of Computers & Structures, 71: 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Wei XY, Yoshimine M, et al. (2001) Effect of failure criterion on elasto-plastic FEM analysis. Invited paper present at the First Asian-Pacific Congress on Computational Mechanics, In: Computational Mechanics-New Frontiers for New Millennium. Valliappan S and Khalili N eds. Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp 1155–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CQ (2005) Study on method of safety evaluation for rock engineering based on failure approach index. Doctoral Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Rock & Soil Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CQ, Zhou H, Feng XT (2008) Numerical format of elastoplastic constitutive model based on the unified strength theory in FLAC~ (3D) Rock and Soil Mechanics, 29(3): 596–602 (in Chinese, English Abstract).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XS, Guan H, Yew-Chaye Loo (2001) UST failure criterion for punching shear analysis of reinforcement concrete slab-column connections. In: Computational Mechanics-New Frontiers for New Millennium, Valliappan S. and Khalili N. eds. Elsevier Science Ltd, pp 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XQ (2002) Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete using Multi-surface Strength Model. Doctoral thesis of Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XQ (2012) 3D Simulation of normal and oblique penetration and perforation. In: Computational Plasticity, Zhejiang University Press & Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, pp 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XQ, Qiang HF and Fan SC (2012) 2D simulation of normal penetration using the unified strength theory. In: Computational Plasticity, Zhejiang University Press & Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, pp 289–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz (1971) The Finite Element Method in Engineering Science. McGraw-Hill: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC and Pande GN (1977) Some useful forms of isotropic yield surfaces for soil and rock mechanics. Finite Elements in Geomechanics. Gudehus G. ed. Wiley: London, pp 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC and Taylor RL (1989) The Finite Element Method, vol. 1, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill: London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, MH., Li, JC. (2012). Introduction. In: Computational Plasticity. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24590-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics