Principled Pragmatism: A Guide to the Adaptation of Ideas from Philosophical Disciplines to Conceptual Modeling

  • David W. Embley
  • Stephen W. Liddle
  • Deryle W. Lonsdale
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6999)

Abstract

The synergism among the traditional disciplines of ontology, epistemology, logic, and linguistics and their potential for enhancing conceptual-modeling applications is not fully understood. Better understanding how to adapt ideas from these disciplines should lead to improved serviceability of conceptual modeling. We argue in this position paper, however, that application objectives, rather than philosophical tenets, should guide the adaptation of ideas from these disciplines. Thus, an appropriate balance of discipline-based theory and pragmatism should temper adaptations. We evaluate the principled pragmatism we advocate by presenting several case-study examples. Each illustrates that an appropriate adaptation of ideas from the disciplines of ontology, epistemology, logic, and linguistics can significantly guide conceptual-modeling research and help build successful conceptual-modeling applications.

Keywords

Conceptual Modeling Information Extraction Historical Document Ontological Commitment External Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, B.: Ontology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 155–166. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu, L., Embley, D.W.: A composite approach to automating direct and indirect schema mappings. Information Systems 31(8), 697–732 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Embley, D.W., Campbell, D.M., Jiang, Y.S., Liddle, S.W., Lonsdale, D.W., Ng, Y.-K., Smith, R.D.: Conceptual-model-based data extraction from multiple-record web pages. Data & Knowledge Engineering 31(3), 227–251 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Lonsdale, D.W.: Conceptual modeling foundations for a web of knowledge. In: Embley, D.W., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges. ch. 15, pp. 477–516. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aristotle. Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, New York, about 350BC (1993 translation)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Embley, D.W., Kurtz, B.D., Woodfield, S.N.: Object-oriented Systems Analysis: A Model-Driven Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Pastor, O.: Conceptual-Model Programming: A Manifesto. ch. 1, pp. 3–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4. Reidel, Boston (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knowledge discovery and dissemination program, http://www.iarpa.gov/solicitations_kdd.html/
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Liddle, S.W., Embley, D.W.: A common core for active conceptual modeling for learning from surprises. In: Chen, P.P., Wong, L.Y. (eds.) ACM-L 2006. LNCS, vol. 4512, pp. 47–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clyde, S.W., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Woodfield, S.N.: OSM-Logic: A Fact-Oriented, Time-Dependent Formalization of Object-oriented Systems Modeling (2012) (submitted for publication, manuscript), www.deg.byu.edu/papers/
  13. 13.
    Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W., Lonsdale, D.W., Tijerino, Y.: Multilingual ontologies for cross-language information extraction and semantic search. In: De Troyer, O., et al. (eds.) ER 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 6999, Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nirenburg, S., Raskin, V., Onyshkevych, B.: Apologiae ontologiae. In: Proceedings of the 1995 AAAI Spring Symposium: Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge: Polysemy, Ambiguity, and Generativity, Menlo Park, California, pp. 95–107 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plato: Theaetetus. BiblioBazaar, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, about 360BC (translated by Benjamin Jowett)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Embley
    • 1
  • Stephen W. Liddle
    • 2
  • Deryle W. Lonsdale
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceBrigham Young UniversityProvoU.S.A.
  2. 2.Information Systems DepartmentBrigham Young UniversityProvoU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of Linguistics and English LanguageBrigham Young UniversityProvoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations