Advertisement

Socio-technical Complex Systems of Systems: Can We Justifiably Trust Their Resilience?

  • Luca Simoncini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6875)

Abstract

This paper does not provide any solutions. It is the author’s view on the limitations of statistical evaluation methods for providing meaningful numerical measurements when dealing with socio-technical complex systems of systems. I discuss the need to rethink many, if not all, aspects of the current design and evaluation paradigms when addressing the design, deployment, governance and operation of pervasive, ubiquitous systems that manage sensitive information with a huge multitude of untrained users in changing environments. The main focus is on the impossibility of anticipating situations and events that we are completely ignorant—or unaware—of in terms of their existence, likelihood, manifestation and consequences. The paper stresses the need for a multi-view resilience-centred holistic approach based on multi-disciplinary experiences. Finally it provides some common sense suggestions on what can be done. I hope at least it will help to instigate a lively discussion on this topic.

Keywords

Resilience socio-technical complex systems of systems design and assessment Black Swan Events 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avižienis, A., Laprie, J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.: Basic Concepts and Taxonomy of Dependable and Secure Computing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 1(1), 11–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Littlewood, B.: Limits to Evaluation of Software Dependability. In: Software Reliability and Metrics, 7th Annual CSR Conference, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, pp. 87–110. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laprie, J.C.: From Dependability to Resilience. Technical report LAAS n. 08001 (2008) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AA. VV.: From Resilience-Building to Resilience-Scaling Technologies: Directions. Deliverable D13, ReSIST Network of Excellence, EU contract n. 026764 (2007), http://www.resist-noe.org/outcomes/outcomes.html
  5. 5.
    Taleb, N.N.: The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House and Penguin, New York (2007) ISBN 978-1-4000-6351-2; The book was completed in 2010 with the second edition including a long essay On Robustness and Fragility Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taleb, N.N.: The Fourth Quadrant: a Map of the Limits of Statistics (2008), http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/taleb08/taleb08_index.html
  7. 7.
    Taleb, N.N.: The Role and Nature of High Impact Events (Black Swans): Technical Commentary and Empirical Data (2008), http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/EDGE/index.html
  8. 8.
    Jackson, S.: Architecting Resilient Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollnagel, E., Woods, D., Leveson, N.: Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK (2006) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Randell, B.: Dependability, Structure and Infrastructure. In: Kowalik, J.S., Gorski, J., Sachenko, A. (eds.) Cyberspace Security and Defence: Research Issues. NATO Science Series II, pp. 143–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) ISBN 1-4020-3380-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, C.B., Hayes, I.J., Jackson, M.A.: Deriving Specifications for Systems that are Connected to the Physical World. In: Jones, C.B., Liu, Z., Woodcock, J. (eds.) Formal Methods and Hybrid Real-Time Systems. LNCS, vol. 4700, pp. 364–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas, M.: The Modest Software Engineer. Keynote Address, Proc. ISADS 2003, pp. 169–174. IEEE Press, Pisa (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Simoncini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations