Advertisement

Next Generation of Modelling Platforms

  • Dimitris Karagiannis
  • Niksa Visic
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 90)

Abstract

Future enterprise systems require an elaborate conceptual foundation that promotes a tight mutual alignment between information systems and business to effectively support business operations and managerial decision-making. Thus a growing number of groups around the world show interest in modelling methods – either standard or individual ones – that satisfy the requirements of their domain and comply with the conceptual foundations. In order to analyze modelling methods in different domains, we introduce a generic modelling method specification framework that describes modelling methods on three major parts: (i) the modelling language that describes the syntax, semantics and notation, (ii) the modelling procedures that describe the methodology as well as (iii) algorithms and mechanisms that provide “functionality to use and evaluate” models described by a modelling language. Simultaneous to the raise of modelling methods there is a need for re-use, integration or combination of different modelling methods. The metamodelling approach is considered to provide the required concepts and mechanisms to combine different modelling methods for the so called Hybrid Method Engineering. The Next Generation Modelling Framework (NGMF) supports Hybrid Method Engineering, both on a conceptual and on a technical integration level. On conceptual level the NGMF provides mechanisms to encapsulate modelling methods and enable the hybrid use of different modelling languages. On technical level the Next Generation Modelling Platform provides functionality for modelling method engineering and modelling method application. The organizational framework is provided by the Open Model Initiative (OMI), which supports users in realizing and applying this approach based on three pillars: community, projects and foundations.

Keywords

Metamodelling Platforms Hybrid Modelling Modelling Methods Modelling Languages ADOxx 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Karagiannis, D., Grossmann, W., Höfferer, P.: Open Model Initiative A Feasibility Study. University of Vienna, Department of Knowledge Engineering (September 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karagiannis, D., Kühn, H.: Metamodelling platforms. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) EC-Web 2002. LNCS, vol. 2455, p. 182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu, T., Ma, W., Liu, L., Karagiannis, D.: Hybrid Modelling: Strategic Model and Business Processes in Active-i*. In: WGBP 2010, Vitoria, ES, Brazil (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brumar, B.A., Popa, E.M.: Advanced techniques for metamodelling. In: Proceeding ICCOMP 2007 Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Computers World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kühn, H., Murzek, M.: Interoperability Issues in Metamodelling Platforms. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA 2005), Geneva, Switzerland. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Open Model Initiative, http://www.openmodels.at/
  7. 7.
    Eclipse Modelling Framework Project (EMF), http://www.eclipse.org/modelling/emf/
  8. 8.
    Kühn, H., Bayer, F., Junginger, S., Karagiannis, D.: Enterprise Model Integration. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) EC-Web 2003. LNCS, vol. 2738, pp. 379–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linthicum, D.S.: Enterprise Application Integration. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ledeczi, A., Maroti, M., Bakay, A., Karsai, G., Garrett, J., Thomason IV, C., Nordstrom, G., Sprinkle, J., Volgyesi, P.: The Generic Modelling Environment. In: Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing at WISP 2001, Budapest, Hungary, May 17 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group: Unified Modelling Language, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/
  12. 12.
    Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility, http://www.omg.org/mof/
  13. 13.
    Object Management Group: Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/mda/
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Graphical Editing Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/gef/
  17. 17.
    Generic Modelling Environment (GME), http://www.isis.vanderbilt.edu/projects/GME
  18. 18.
    Object Constraint Language (OCL), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL
  19. 19.
    Clark, T., Evans, A., Sammut, P., Willans, J.: Applied Metamodelling - A Foundation for Language Driven Development, Version 0.1 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Domain-Specific Modelling - Enabling Full Code Generation. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frank, U.: Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling (MEMO) - Conceptual Framework and Modelling Languages. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M.: Enterprise Modelling. AI Magazine 19(3) (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Capuruço, R.A.C., Capretz, L.F.: A Unifying Framework for Building Social Computing Applications. In: Lytras, M.D., Damiani, E., Tennyson, R.D. (eds.) WSKS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5288, pp. 11–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kurtev, I., Bezivin, J., Jouault, F., Valduriez, P.: Model-based DSL Frameworks. In: Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA 2006), Portland, Oregon, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zivkovic, S., Kühn, H., Karagiannis, D.: Facilitate Modelling Using Method Integration: An Approach Using Mappings and Integration Rules. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings. Paper 122 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 243–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Utz, W., Woitsch, R., Karagiannis, D.: Conceptualisation of Hybrid Service Models: An Open Models Approach. In: The 4th International IEEE Workshop on Service Science and Systems, Held in Conjunction with COMPSAC 2011 (in press, 2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hrgovcic, V., Utz, W., Karagiannis, D.: Service Modeling: A Model Based Approach for Business and IT Alignment. In: The 5th International IEEE Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Services, held in Conjunction with COMPSAC 2011 (in press, 2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Karagiannis
    • 1
  • Niksa Visic
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Engineering Research GroupUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations