Learning in Real Life

  • Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen


The topic Designing Work Systems for Learning in Real Life is essential for European countries including the Danish industry and service sector. A multitude of social research and development projects on this issue have been conducted in Denmark since 1970’s. The topic, however, is still relevant to focus on, partly due to the rising complexity of organizational structures and partly because several obstacles to learning in real work systems still seem to play an obstructive role.


Interactive Method Design Game Trust Building Repository System Comprehensive Rationale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen V, and Andersen AS (2007) Learning environment at work: Dilemmas facing professional employees. In: Human Resource Development Review, vol 6, 2: 185-207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broberg O (2007) Integrating ergonomics into engineering: empirical evidence and implications for the ergonomists’. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol 17: 353-366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eikeland O (2007) Why should mainstream social researchers be interested in action research? In: International Journal of Action Research, vol 3, 1/2: 38-64Google Scholar
  4. Eijnatten FM v (1993) The paradigm that changed the Work Place. The Swedish Center for Working Life. Van Gorcum, Assen, NLGoogle Scholar
  5. Nonaka I, Takeushi H (1995) The knowledge creating Company. Oxford University press, USGoogle Scholar
  6. Kristiansen M (2007) Relational and Existential Challenges of Practicing Dialogical Action Research – Working with Social Concrete Blocks in Organizations. In: International Journal of Action Research, vol 3, 1+2: 15-37Google Scholar
  7. Rasmussen LB (2011) Facilitating Change – Using interactive methods in organizations, communities and networks. Polyteknisk Forlag, DK (in print)Google Scholar
  8. Rasmussen LB (2008) Models for Sustainable Development – A Danish-Chinese Approach to regional development of education, work and technology based on a multi-dimensional understanding of sustainability. In: Szell G, Bösling CH, Szell U (ed) Education, labour & science: Perspectives for the 21st Century. Peter Lang, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt a.M.: 197-232Google Scholar
  9. Rasmussen LB (2005) The narrative aspect of scenario building – How story telling may give people a memory of the future. AI & Society, vol 19, 1: 229-249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rasmussen LB (2004) Sustainable entrepreneurship and quality of work. In Garibaldo F, Telljohann V (ed) Globalisation, Company Strategies and Quality of Working Life in Europe. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.: 251-278Google Scholar
  11. Schön DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner – How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Summers J, Hyman J (2005) Employee participation and company performance. A review of literature. York publishing Design, Ltd, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Surie G, Hazy JK (2007) Generative leadership: Nurturing Innovation in complex systems. In: Heckscher C, Adler PS (ed) (2007) The firm as a Collaborative Firm. Oxford University Press, UK: 349-366Google Scholar
  14. Weber M (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Parsons, Transl. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations