Advertisement

Love and Loyalty in Car Brands: Segmentation Using Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares

  • Sandra Loureiro
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

This study seeks to understand the relationship among brand love, inner self, social self, and loyalty perceived by users of three car brands. The model estimation includes structural equation analysis, using the PLS approach and applying the finite mixture partial least squares (FIMIX-PLS) to segment the sample. The research findings showed that area of residence and age are the main difference that characterizes the two uncovered customer segments. Car users of the large segment live mainly in the big city Oporto and are younger than car users of the small segment. For this small group, social self doesn’t contribute to enrich the brand love, they don’t give very much importance to what others think of them, and so, the social aspects and the social image are not a key factor to create a passion and an attraction to the car brand. Indirectly, the social identification is not important to reinforce the intention to recommend and to buy a car with the same brand in the future. On the other hand, the cosmopolitan car users of the large segment consider that the car brand image should fit their inner self and the social group of belonging in order to improve the love to the brand and the intention to recommend and to buy a car with the same car brand in the future.

Keywords

Discriminant Validity Finite Mixture Emotional Attachment Social Identification Positive Direct Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ACP Automovel Clube de Portugal (2009) Qashqai carro do ano 2008. URL http://www.acp.pt/index.php?template_id=6165
  2. Ahuvia AC (2005) Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers identity narratives. J Consum Res 32:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs D, de Ville B, Suen E (1991) A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat 18(1):49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Ed. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll B, Ahuvia A (2006) Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Market Lett 17:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandler CH (1989) Quality: Beyond customer satisfaction. Qual Progr 22:30–32Google Scholar
  7. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, Mahwah, NJ, pp 295–358Google Scholar
  8. Chin WW (2011) Frequently asked questions partial least squares and PLS-graph, 2000. URL http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfaq/plsfaq.htm
  9. Fornell C, Bookstein FL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice. J Market Res 19:440–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural models with unobservables variables and measurement error. J Market Res 28:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fournier S (1998) Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. J Consum Res 24:343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hahn C, Johnson MD, Herrmann A, Huber F (2002) Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 54(3):243–269Google Scholar
  13. Loureiro SM, Miranda FJ (2008) The importance of quality, satisfaction, trust, and image in relation to rural tourist loyalty. J Travel Tour Market 25(2):117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliver RL, Rust RT, Varki S (1997) Customer delight: Foundations, findings and managerial insight. J Retail 73(3):311–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramaswamy V, DeSarbo WS, Reibstein DJ, Robinson WT (1993) An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Market Sci 12(1):103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Regan PC, Kocan ER, Whitlock T (1998) Aint love grand! A prototype analysis of the concept of romantic love. J Soc Personal Relation 15:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48:159–205zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeithaml V, Berry L, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioural consequences of service quality. J Market 60(2):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations