Evaluation and Comparison Criteria for Approaches to Probabilistic Relational Knowledge Representation

  • Christoph Beierle
  • Marc Finthammer
  • Gabriele Kern-Isberner
  • Matthias Thimm
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7006)

Abstract

In the past ten years, the areas of probabilistic inductive logic programming and statistical relational learning put forth a large collection of approaches to combine relational representations of knowledge with probabilistic reasoning. Here, we develop a series of evaluation and comparison criteria for those approaches and focus on the point of view of knowledge representation and reasoning. These criteria address abstract demands such as language aspects, the relationships to propositional probabilistic and first-order logic, and their treatment of information on individuals. We discuss and illustrate the criteria thoroughly by applying them to several approaches to probabilistic relational knowledge representation, in particular, Bayesian logic programs, Markov logic networks, and three approaches based on the principle of maximum entropy.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Maximum Entropy Knowledge Representation Propositional Knowledge Ground Instance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G.: The relationship of the logic of big-stepped probabilities to standard probabilistic logics. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 191–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruynooghe, M., et al.: An Exercise with Statistical Relational Learning Systems. In: Domingos, P., Kersting, K. (eds.) International Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning (SRL 2009), Leuven, Belgium (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Raedt, L., Kersting, K.: Probabilistic inductive logic programming. In: De Raedt, L., Frasconi, P., Kersting, K., Muggleton, S.H. (eds.) Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4911, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delgrande, J.: On first-order conditional logics. Artificial Intelligence 105, 105–137 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Domingos, P., Lowd, D.: Markov Logic: An Interface Layer for Artificial Intelligence. In: Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan and Claypool, San Rafael (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisseler, J.: Learning and Modeling with Probabilistic Conditional Logic. Dissertations in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 328. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Getoor, L., Taskar, B. (eds.): Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaeger, M.: Relational Bayesian Networks: A Survey. Electronic Transactions in Artificial Intelligence 6 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaeger, M.: Model-Theoretic Expressivity Analysis. In: De Raedt, L., Frasconi, P., Kersting, K., Muggleton, S.H. (eds.) Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4911, pp. 325–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain, D., Mösenlechner, L., Beetz, M.: Equipping Robot Control Programs with First-Order Probabilistic Reasoning Capabilities. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3130–3135 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kern-Isberner, G.: Characterizing the principle of minimum cross-entropy within a conditional-logical framework. Artificial Intelligence 98, 169–208 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kern-Isberner, G., Thimm, M.: Novel Semantical Approaches to Relational Probabilistic Conditionals. In: Proc. Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), pp. 382–392 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loh, S., Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: On the problem of grounding a relational probabilistic conditional knowledge base. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2010), Toronto, Canada (May 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paris, J.B.: The uncertain reasoner’s companion – A mathematical perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poole, D.: First-order probabilistic inference. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) Proc. IJCAI 2003, pp. 985–991. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singla, P., Domingos, P.: Lifted first-order belief propagation. In: Fox, D., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1094–1099. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thimm, M., Finthammer, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C.: Comparing approaches to relational probabilistic reasoning: Theory and implementation (2010) (submitted)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Fisseler, J.: Relational probabilistic conditional reasoning at maximum entropy. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS, vol. 6717, pp. 447–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Beierle
    • 1
  • Marc Finthammer
    • 1
  • Gabriele Kern-Isberner
    • 2
  • Matthias Thimm
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceFernUniversitätHagenGermany
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceTU DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations