Why We Need Evolutionary Semantics

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7006)


One of the key components for achieving flexible, robust, adaptive and open-ended language-based communication between humans and robots - or between robots and robots - is rich deep semantics. AI has a long tradition of work in the representation of knowledge, most of it within the logical tradition. This tradition assumes that an autonomous agent is able to derive formal descriptions of the world which can then be the basis of logical inference and natural language understanding or production. This paper outlines some difficulties with this logical stance and reports alternative research on the development of an ‘embodied cognitive semantics’ that is grounded in the world through a robot’s sensori-motor system and is evolutionary in the sense that the conceptual frameworks underlying language are assumed to be adapted by agents in the course of dialogs and thus undergo constant change.


Human Language Complex Adaptive System Language Game Color Category Spatial Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bleys, J.: Language Strategies for Color. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. John Benjamins Pub. Co., Amsterdam (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evans, N., Levinson, S.: The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5), 429–492 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frank, S., Bod, R.: Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure. Psychological Science (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garrod, S., Anderson, A.: Saying What You Mean in Dialogue: A Study in Conceptual and Semantic Coordination. Cognition 27, 181–218 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klatt, D.: Review of the ARPA speech understanding project. In: Readings in Speech Recognition. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kowalski, R.: Artificial Intelligence and Human Thinking. In: IJCAI 2011. Computers and Thought Lecture (2011),
  7. 7.
    Spranger, M., Pauw, S., Loetzsch, M., Steels, L.: A Formalism for Embodied Cognitive Semantics. In: Hild, M., Steels, L. (eds.) A Whole-Systems Approach to Language Grounding in Robots. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCarthy, J.: Programs with Common Sense. In: Mechanisation of Thought Processes. In: Proceedings of the Symposium of the National Physics Laboratory, London, U.K, pp. 77–84 (1959)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nilsson, N.: Shakey The Robot, Technical Note 323. AI Center, SRI International (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Regier, T., Kay, P.: Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 439–446 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spranger, M.: The co-evolution of basic spatial terms and categories. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. John Benjamins Pub. Co., Amsterdam (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steels, L.: The emergence of grammar in communicating autonomous robotic agents. In: Horn, W. (ed.) ECAI 2000: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 764–769. IOS Publishing, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steels, L.: Language as a Complex Adaptive System. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 17–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steels, L.: The Recruitment Theory of Language Origins. In: Lyon, C., Nehaniv, C., Cangelosi, A. (eds.) The Emergence of Communication and Language, pp. 129–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steels, L., Van Trijp, R.: How to Make Construction Grammars Fluid and Robust. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. John Benjamins Pub. Co., Amsterdam (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talmy, L.: Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems (Language, Speech, and Communication). The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wahlster, W.: Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation. Springer, Berlin (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winograd, T.: Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press, London (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICREA, IBE(UPF-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Sony Computer Science LaboratoryParisFrance

Personalised recommendations