Skip to main content

Remarks on Pairwise Comparison Numerical and Non-numerical Rankings

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6954))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A relationship between pairwise comparison classical numerical ranking and a partial order based pairwise comparison non-numerical ranking is discussed. A consistent non-numerical ranking that is equivalent to a given consistent numerical ranking is constructed and the correctness of this construction is proven. A new concept of consistency for the pairwise comparison classical numerical ranking is given.

Partially supported by NSERC Grant of Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bozóki, S., Rapcsák, T.: On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Global Optimization 42(2), 157–175 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowan, N.: The magical number 4 in short-term memory. A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 24, 87–185 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. David, H.A.: The Method of Paired Comparisons. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond, J.: The Third Chimpanzee. HarperCollins, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Sci. 36, 244–258 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishburn, P.C.: Interval Orders and Interval Graphs. J. Wiley, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fülöp, J.: A method for approximating pairwise comparison matrices by consistent matrices. Journal of Global Optimization 42, 423–442 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Janicki, R.: Pairwise Comparisons, Incomparability and Partial Orders. In: Proc. of ICEIS 2007, Int. Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support System, Funchal, Portugal, vol. 2, pp. 296–302 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janicki, R.: Pairwise Comparisons Based Non-Numerical Ranking. Fundamenta Informaticae 94, 197–217 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Janicki, R., Koczkodaj, W.W.: Weak Order Approach to Group Ranking. Computers Math. Applic. 32(2), 51–59 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Janicki, R., Zhai, Y.: On a Pairwise Comparison Based Consistent Non-Numerical Ranking. Logic Journal of IGPL (2011), doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzr018

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koczkodaj, W.W.: A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 18, 79–84 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Koczkodaj, W.W., Szarek, S.J.: On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18(6), 859–869 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong, F., Liu, H.: Applying fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences 1(3-4), 406–412 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Llull, R.: Artifitium electionis personarum, Manuscript written between 1274-83. Studia Lulliana 41, 3–38 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T.L.: A Scaling Methods for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhai, Y.: Pairwise Comparisons Based Non-Numerical Ranking, PhD Thesis, Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (2010), http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~zhaiy/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Janicki, R., Zhai, Y. (2011). Remarks on Pairwise Comparison Numerical and Non-numerical Rankings. In: Yao, J., Ramanna, S., Wang, G., Suraj, Z. (eds) Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. RSKT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6954. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24425-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24425-4_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24424-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24425-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics