Fusion of Digital Elevation Models Using Sparse Representations

  • Haris Papasaika
  • Effrosyni Kokiopoulou
  • Emmanuel Baltsavias
  • Konrad Schindler
  • Daniel Kressner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6952)

Abstract

Nowadays, different sensors and processing techniques provide Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) for the same site, which differ significantly with regard to their geometric characteristics and accuracy. Each DEM contains intrinsic errors due to the primary data acquisition technology, the processing chain, and the characteristics of the terrain. DEM fusion aims at overcoming the limitations of different DEMs by merging them in an intelligent way. In this paper we present a generic algorithmic approach for fusing two arbitrary DEMs, using the framework of sparse representations. We conduct extensive experiments with real DEMs from different earth observation satellites to validate the proposed approach. Our evaluation shows that, together with adequately chosen fusion weights, the proposed algorithm yields consistently better DEMs.

Keywords

DEMs fusion quality evaluation learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Damon, J.: Fusing Lidar and IfSAR DEMs: a seven-step methodology. In: 22nd ESRI International Conference (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Elad, M., Aharon, M.: Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 15(12), 3736–3745 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elad, M.: Michael Elad personal webpage, software (2011), http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~elad/software/
  4. Gamba, P., Dell’acqua, F., Houshmand, B.: Comparison and fusion of Lidar and InSAR digital elevation models over urban areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24(22), 4289–4300 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruen, A., Akca, D.: Least squares 3D surface and curve matching. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 59(3), 151–174 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Honikel, M.: Strategies and methods for the fusion of digital elevation models from optical and SAR data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 32(7-4-3W6), 83–89 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. Horn, B.: Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proceedings of the IEEE 69(1), 14–47 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kääb, A.: Combination of SRTM3 and repeat ASTER data for deriving alpine glacier flow velocities in the Bhutan Himalaya. Remote Sensing of Environment 94(4), 463–474 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mallat, S.: A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Podobnikar, T.: Production of integrated digital terrain model from multiple datasets of different quality. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(1), 69–89 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rao, Y.S., Rao, K.S., Venkataraman, G., Khare, M., Reddy, C.: Comparison and fusion of DEMs derived from InSAR and optical stereo techniques. In: Third ESA International Workshop on ERS SAR Interferometry (2003)Google Scholar
  12. Roth, A., Knöpfle, W., Strunz, G., Lehner, M., Reinartz, P.: Towards a global elevation product: combination of multi-source digital elevation models. In: Joint International Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications (2002)Google Scholar
  13. Schultz, H., Riseman, E.M., Stolle, F.R., Woo, D.-M.: Error detection and DEM fusion using self-consistency. In: International Conference on Computer Vision (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Slatton, K., Teng, S., Crawford, M.: Multiscale fusion of InSAR data for hydrological applications. In: Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications (2002)Google Scholar
  15. Tibshirani, R.: Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal. Statist. Soc B. 58(1), 267–288 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang, J., Wright, J., Huang, T.S., Ma, Y.: Image super-resolution as sparse representation of raw image patches. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haris Papasaika
    • 1
  • Effrosyni Kokiopoulou
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Baltsavias
    • 1
  • Konrad Schindler
    • 1
  • Daniel Kressner
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Geodesy and PhotogrammetryETH ZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Seminar for Applied MathematicsETH ZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Mathematics Institute of Computational Science and EngineeringEPFLSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations