Potential Analysis

  • Timm Gudehus
  • Herbert Kotzab


The task of a potential analysis is to compare the services and performances of a company with the external and internal requirements. During a logistic audit, the capabilities, capacities and performances of the logistic stations, the network structure and the processes are scrutinized and evaluated (Straube/Gudehus 1994).


Failure Station Potential Analysis Safety Stock Load Carrier Logistic Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baumgarten H.: Prozeßanalyse logistischer Abläufe, Fabrik, 43, 14–17, 1993Google Scholar
  2. Camp R.: Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance, Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press, 1989Google Scholar
  3. Shapiro R.: Get leverage from logistics. Harvard Business Review, 62, 3, 119–126, 1984Google Scholar
  4. Watson G.: Strategic benchmarking: How to rate your company's performance against the world's best, New York, Wiley, 1993Google Scholar
  5. Axson D., Hermann K.R.: Performance management and reporting best practice, John Wiley & Sons, 2003Google Scholar
  6. Dahlgaard J., Kristensen K., Kanij G.P.: Fundamentals of total quality management, Process Analysis and Improvements, Nelson Thomas, 1997Google Scholar
  7. DIN EN ISO 9000ff, Quality management and quality assurance, Beuth, 1994Google Scholar
  8. Goldratt E.M., Cox J.: The goal, excellence in manufacturing, Campus, Frankfurt/New York, 3rd edition, 2002Google Scholar
  9. Reider R.: Benchmarking strategies, John Wiley & Sons, 1999Google Scholar
  10. Straube F., Gudehus T.: Auch die Logistik gehört auf den Prüfstand, Harvard Business Manager, 4, 72–81, 1994Google Scholar
  11. Scholz-Reiter B., Stahlmann H.-D., Nethe A.: Process modeling, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Röder A., Sesterhenn J., Friehmuth U.: Standards für den Logistikvergleich – Benchmarking für Produktionsunternehmen, Logistik Heute, 98, 10, 48–52, 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HamburgGermany
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations