Superposition Modulo Non-linear Arithmetic

  • Andreas Eggers
  • Evgeny Kruglov
  • Stefan Kupferschmid
  • Karsten Scheibler
  • Tino Teige
  • Christoph Weidenbach
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6989)

Abstract

The first-order theory over non-linear arithmetic including transcendental functions (NLA) is undecidable. Nevertheless, in this paper we show that a particular combination with superposition leads to a sound and complete calculus that is useful in practice. We follow basically the ideas of the SUP(LA) combination, but have to take care of undecidability, resulting in “unknown” answers by the NLA reasoning procedure. A pipeline of NLA constraint simplification techniques related to the SUP(NLA) framework significantly decreases the number of “unknown” answers. The resulting approach is implemented as SUP(NLA) by a system combination of Spass and iSAT. Applied to various scenarios of traffic collision avoidance protocols, we show by experiments that Spass(iSAT) can fully automatically proof and disproof safety properties of such protocols using the very same formalization.

Keywords

Horn Clause Empty Clause Linear Arithmetic Arithmetic Constraint Uninterpreted Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Althaus, E., Kruglov, E., Weidenbach, C.: Superposition modulo linear arithmetic SUP(LA). In: Ghilardi, S., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) FroCoS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5749, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., Waldmann, U.: Refutational theorem proving for hierarchic first-order theories. AAECC 5(3/4), 193–212 (1994)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett, C., Sebastiani, R., Seshia, S.A., Tinelli, C.: Satisfiability modulo theories. In: Biere, A., Heule, M.J.H., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, ch. 26, pp. 825–885. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer, A., Pister, M., Tautschnig, M.: Tool-support for the analysis of hybrid systems and models. In: DATE 2007, Nice, France, pp. 924–929 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgartner, P., Fuchs, A., Tinelli, C.: ME(LIA) - model evolution with linear integer arithmetic constraints. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5330, pp. 258–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benhamou, F., Granvilliers, L.: Continuous and interval constraints. In: Rossi, F., van Beek, P., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Constraint Programming. Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, ch. 16, pp. 571–603. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A Machine Program for Theorem Proving. CACM 5, 394–397 (1962)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory. Journal of the ACM 7(3), 201–215 (1960)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Moura, L.M., Bjørner, N.: Engineering DPLL(T) + saturation. In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5195, pp. 475–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Moura, L.M., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolzmann, A., Sturm, T.: Redlog: Computer algebra meets computer logic. ACM SIGSAM Bulletin 31(2), 2–9 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eggers, A., Kruglov, E., Kupferschmid, S., Scheibler, K., Teige, T., Weidenbach, C.: Superposition modulo non-linear arithmetic. Report of SFB/TR 14 AVACS 80 (August 2011), http://www.avacs.org
  13. 13.
    Fränzle, M., Herde, C., Teige, T., Ratschan, S., Schubert, T.: Efficient solving of large non-linear arithmetic constraint systems with complex Boolean structure. JSAT 1(3-4), 209–236 (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gao, S., Ganai, M.K., Ivancic, F., Gupta, A., Sankaranarayanan, S., Clarke, E.M.: Integrating ICP and LRA solvers for deciding nonlinear real arithmetic problems. In: FMCAD 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henzinger, T., Horowitz, B., Majumdar, R., Wong-Toi, H.: Beyond hytech: Hybrid systems analysis using interval numerical methods. In: Lynch, N.A., Krogh, B.H. (eds.) HSCC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1790, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herde, C.: Efficient Solving of Large Arithmetic Constraint Systems with Complex Boolean Structure: Proof Engines for the Analysis of Hybrid Discrete–Continuous Systems. Doctoral dissertation, Carlvon Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horbach, M., Weidenbach, C.: Superposition for fixed domains. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 11(4), 1–35 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keddis, N.: Strong satisfaction. Bachelorthesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (September 2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kupferschmid, S., Becker, B., Teige, T., Fränzle, M.: Proof certificates and non-linear arithmetic constraints. In: IEEE Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Platzer, A., Clarke, E.: The image computation problem in hybrid systems model checking. In: Bemporad, A., Bicchi, A., Buttazzo, G. (eds.) HSCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4416, pp. 473–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Revol, N., Rouillier, F., Chevillard, S., Lauter, C., Nguyen, H.D., Theveny, P.: Mpfi: Multiple precision floating-point interval arithmeticm, https://gforge.inria.fr/projects/mpfi/
  22. 22.
    Tomlin, C.J., Pappas, G.J., Sastry, S.: Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multi-agent hybrid systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 43(4), 509–521 (1998)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weidenbach, C., Dimova, D., Fietzke, A., Suda, M., Wischnewski, P.: SPASS version 3.5. In: Schmidt, R.A. (ed.) CADE-22. LNCS, vol. 5663, pp. 140–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Eggers
    • 1
  • Evgeny Kruglov
    • 2
  • Stefan Kupferschmid
    • 3
  • Karsten Scheibler
    • 3
  • Tino Teige
    • 1
  • Christoph Weidenbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computing ScienceCarl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.Universität des Saarlandes, Max-Planck-Institut für InformatikSaarbrückenGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Computer ScienceAlbert-Ludwigs-UniversityFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations