Skip to main content

Failures of a Business Process in Enterprise Systems

  • Conference paper
ENTERprise Information Systems (CENTERIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 219))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A business process model typically describes a desired flow of events in an ideal environment. However, the reality tends to be more complicated than what is designed in the model. During the execution of business process instances, a lot of exceptions may occur. These exceptions are deviations from the correct, specified sequence of events. Thus it is important to know the behaviours of process instances in the presence of exceptions. The classical approach of incorporating exception analysis in process models has been trying to anticipate beforehand all possible exceptional conditions that might arise and argue the process model with those additional conditions in order to determine the exception handling actions. This approach, however, might be problematic because the identification of all possible exceptions relies on the experience and intuition of the participants.To have a clear understand of the failure behaviour of a business process is equal important, but first of all, it has to be studied what characteristics of failure often have. In this paper, we present the initial findings of our project that targets to the enterprise issues of healthcare systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taxonomy for software engineering standards ANSI/IEEE STD 1002-1987, IEEE the institute of electrical and electronics engineers

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acute stroke/ transitient ischaemic attack suspected (January 2010), http://healthguides.mapofmedicine.com/choices/map/stroke2.html

  3. Blackwelder, R.E.: Taxonomy: A text and reference book. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brook, R.H., McGlynn, E.A., Cleary, P.D.: Quality of health care. part 2: measuring quality of care. The New England Journal of Medicine 335, 966–970 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chillarege, R., Kao, W.L., Condit, R.G.: Orthogonal defect classification- a concept for in-process measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18, 943–956 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donabedian, A.: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Health Administration Press (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goddard, P.L.: Software FMEA Techniques. In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 118–123 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon, A.D.: Classification, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haywood-Farmer, J., Alleyne, A., Duffus, B., Downing, M.: Controlling service quality. Business Quarlerly 50(4), 62–67 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haywood-Farmer, J.: A conceptual model of service quality. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 8(6), 19–29 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lutz, R.R.: Targeting safety-rated errors during software requirements analysis. In: ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, vol. 18(5), pp. 99–106 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McDermid, J., Nicholson, M., Pumfrey, D., Fenelon, P.: Experience with the application of HAZOP to computer-based systems. In: Compass 1995: 10th Annual Conference on Computer Assurance, pp. 37–48. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49, 41–50 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivarajan, V.V., Robson, N.K.B.: Introduction to the principles of plant taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smidts, C., Sova, D.: An architectural model for software reliability quantification: Source of data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 64, 279–290 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace, D.R., Kuhn, D.R.: Failure modes in medical devices software: an analysis of 15 years of recall data. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 8(4), 351–371 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Auramaki, E., Leppanen, M.: Exceptions and office information systems. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.4 Working Conference on Office Information Systems: The Design Process., Linz, Austria (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karbe, B.H., Ramsberger, N.G.: Influence of Exception Handling on the Support of Cooperative Office Work. Multi-User Interfaces and Applications (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, M.: An Exception Handling Approach to Enhancing Consistency, Completeness and Correctness in Collaborative Requirements Capture. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications (March 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klein, M.: Exception Handling in Process Enactment Systems. MIT Center for Coordination Science, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kreifelts, T., Woetzel, G.: Distribution and Error Handling in an Office Procedure System. In: IFIP WF 8.4 Working Conference on Methods and Tools for Office Systems, Pisa, Italy (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kunin, J.S.: Analysis and Specification of Office Procedures. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 232. MIT, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mi, P., Scacchi, W.: Articulation: An Integrated Approach to the Diagnosis, Replanning and Rescheduling of Software Process Failures. In: Proceedings of 8th Knowledge-Based Software Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, USA. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Strong, D.M.: Decision support for exception handling and quality control in office operations. Decision Support Systems 8(3) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S., Pozzi, G.: Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM Transaction of Database System 24(3), 405–451 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ge, X., Paige, R.F., McDermid, J.A. (2011). Failures of a Business Process in Enterprise Systems. In: Cruz-Cunha, M.M., Varajão, J., Powell, P., Martinho, R. (eds) ENTERprise Information Systems. CENTERIS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24357-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24358-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics