Parametric Verification and Test Coverage for Hybrid Automata Using the Inverse Method

  • Laurent Fribourg
  • Ulrich Kühne
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6945)


Hybrid systems combine continuous and discrete behavior. Hybrid Automata are a powerful formalism for the modeling and verification of such systems. A common problem in hybrid system verification is the good parameters problem, which consists in identifying a set of parameter valuations which guarantee a certain behavior of a system. Recently, a method has been presented for attacking this problem for Timed Automata. In this paper, we show the extension of this methodology for hybrid automata with linear and affine dynamics. The method is demonstrated with a hybrid system benchmark from the literature.


Hybrid System Inverse Method Reachable State Label Transition System Parameter Synthesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alur, R., Kanade, A., Ramesh, S., Shashidhar, K.: Symbolic analysis for improving simulation coverage of simulink/stateflow models. In: EMSOFT, pp. 89–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    André, É.: IMITATOR: A tool for synthesizing constraints on timing bounds of timed automata. In: Leucker, M., Morgan, C. (eds.) ICTAC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5684, pp. 336–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    André, É.: IMITATOR II: A tool for solving the good parameters problem in timed automata. In: INFINITY. EPTCS, vol. 39, pp. 91–99 (September 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    André, É., Chatain, T., Encrenaz, E., Fribourg, L.: An inverse method for parametric timed automata. IJFCS 20(5), 819–836 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    André, É., Fribourg, L.: Behavioral cartography of timed automata. In: Kučera, A., Potapov, I. (eds.) RP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6227, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagnara, R., Hill, P., Zaffanella, E.: Applications of polyhedral computations to the analysis and verification of hardware and software systems. Theoretical Computer Science 410(46), 4672–4691 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fehnker, A., Ivancic, F.: Benchmarks for hybrid systems verification. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frehse, G.: PHAVer: algorithmic verification of hybrid systems past HyTech. STTT 10(3), 263–279 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frehse, G., Jha, S., Krogh, B.: A counterexample-guided approach to parameter synthesis for linear hybrid automata. In: Egerstedt, M., Mishra, B. (eds.) HSCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4981, pp. 187–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fribourg, L., Kühne, U.: Parametric verification of hybrid automata using the inverse method. Research Report LSV-11-04, LSV, ENS Cachan, France (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henzinger, T., Ho, P.-H., Wong-Toi, H.: HyTech: A model checker for hybrid systems. STTT 1, 110–122 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henzinger, T., Kopke, P., Puri, A., Varaiya, P.: What’s decidable about hybrid automata? In: JCSS, pp. 373–382 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hune, T., Romijn, J., Stoelinga, M., Vaandrager, F.: Linear parametric model checking of timed automata. JLAP 52-53, 183–220 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jha, S., Krogh, B., Weimer, J., Clarke, E.: Reachability for linear hybrid automata using iterative relaxation abstraction. In: Bemporad, A., Bicchi, A., Buttazzo, G. (eds.) HSCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4416, pp. 287–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Julius, A., Fainekos, G., Anand, M., Lee, I., Pappas, G.: Robust test generation and coverage for hybrid systems. In: Bemporad, A., Bicchi, A., Buttazzo, G. (eds.) HSCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4416, pp. 329–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silva, B., Krogh, B.: Modeling and verification of sampled-data hybrid systems. In: ADPM (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Fribourg
    • 1
  • Ulrich Kühne
    • 1
  1. 1.LSV - ENS Cachan & CNRSCachanFrance

Personalised recommendations