Abstract
Advances in microelectronics and the increasing use of digital mobile technologies associated with location based service (LBS) provision and consumption, have started to profoundly change the way we make decisions about when, how and where we do things. Microelectronics based modes of communication have extended our capacity to escape the ‘spatial fix’ that has constrained our ability to access and consume services outside the home environment in the past. In the mean time, spatially dispersed ageing population is becoming a challenging issue for public policy makers in many developed countries. Australia has opted to deal with this unprecedented ageing issue via an ‘ageing in place’ strategy, encouraging the elderly or seniors to live in their own housing for as long as possible, with only minimal support from public authorities. This strategy has been widely supported by the community. However, it poses a number of serious challenges for both policy makers and seniors alike. These include the issue of personal mobility and the ability to access those things that are deemed essential to ones well-being and quality of life from outside the home. The elderly or seniors are often identified as being subject to social exclusion because of difficulties associated with travelling outside their homes to access services and facilities, especially towards the outskirts of major urban centres, where services and facilities are generally only readily accessible by car. As drivers age and are required to surrender their driving licences, accessibility to a range of services and facilities either in their immediate neighbourhood or surrounding region will become a major issue especially in those locales where public transport infrastructure is inadequate.
To better understand the potential benefits that LBS based technologies have for the elderly members of our society, this paper presents an empirical assessment and visualisation of micro level manifestations of location disadvantage within residential suburbs of Melbourne using GIS-based spatial analytical procedures and fine spatial resolution data sets. The paper presents the spatial patterns of accessibility in terms of the shortest network distance travelled from residential locations to their nearest essential services and facilities, such as medical centre, pharmacy, bank, library, church, shopping centre, bus stop, train station, social club, etc. This spatially dispersed aging population lives in or on the outskirts of metropolitan Melbourne, and some of whom do not have ready access to a car or public transport service. This case study reveals that the existence of social exclusion amongst non-car driving seniors is being reinforced by a regional public transport system that can not adequately service the entire municipality, as too much reliance continues to be placed on the ownership and usage of cars.
The paper points out that there is a range of specific applications of LBS technology that can benefit the wellbeing of seniors, especially non-driving seniors; the next wave of retirees will be more technologically savvy and shall have fewer difficulties using the latest microelectronic devices that can disseminate LBS information; designers of LBS applications will need to take account of this development. The approaches taken and the findings made in this study should be useful to public policy makers, government and non-government service providers and developers of LBS applications in many countries who will all be confronted by this same policy problem within the next two decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ABS., 2006 National Census of Australia, Melbourne Statistical Division, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
Alsnih, R., and Hensher, D., 2003 The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an ageing population, Transportation Research: Part A, 37, 903–916.
Buchanan, N., et al., 2005 Transport Disadvantage and Social Status: A Gold Coast Pilot Research Project, Research Monograph No. 8, Urban Research Program, Griffith University, Brisbane.
Banister, D., and Bowling, A., 2004 Quality of life for elderly: the transport dimension, Transport Policy, 11:105–115.
Beed, C., 1981 Melbourne’s Development and Planning, Clewara Press, Melbourne.
Berry, M., 2007Ageing in Space: Transport,Access and Urban Form, In Borowski,A., Encel, S., and Ozanne, E., Eds., Longevity and Social Change in Australia, University of New South Wales Press, Kensington.
Browning, C., and Sims, J., 2007 Ageing without Driving: Keeping Older People Connected: In Currie, G., Stanley, J., and Stanley, J., 2007 Eds., No Way to Go: Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities, Monash University ePress, Clayton.
Burns, P. 1999 Navigation and the mobility of older drivers, The Journal of Gerontology, 54B (1) 49–55.
Cantor, M. 1979 Neighbors and Friends, Research on Aging, 1 (4), 434–463.
Cheal, C., 2003 Transit Rich or Transit Poor: Is Public Transport Policy in Melbourne Exacerbating Social Disadvantage? Unpublished Honours thesis, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Church, A., et al., 2001 Transport and social exclusion in London, Journal of Transport Policy, 7 (3), 195–205.
Coates, B., et al., 1977 Geography and Inequality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Currie, G., 2004. Gap analysis of public transport needs: measuring spatial distribution of public transport needs and identifying gaps in the quality of public transport provision. Transportation Research Record 1895, 137–146.
Currie, G., and Senbergs, Z., 2007 Identifying Spatial Gaps in Public Transport Provision for Socially Disadvantaged Australians: The Melbourne ‘Needs Gap’ Study, paper delivered at the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Melbourne.
Currie, G., et al., 2007 Eds., No Way to Go: Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities, Monash University ePress, Clayton.
Currie, G. et al. 2009 Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in MelbournePreliminary results Transport Policy 16:97–105
Currie, G., 2009. Australian Urban Transport and Social Disadvantage. Australian Economic Review Special Forum Edition on Urban Transport, The Australian Economic Review, 42 (2): 201–208.
Currie, G. 2009 Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs, Journal of Transport Geography 18(1):31–41.
Currie G and Delbosc A., 2010 Exploring Public Transport Usage Trends in an Ageing Population’ Transportation Vol 37 pp 151–164.
Davison, G., 2004 Car Wars: How the Car Won Our Hearts and Conquered Our Cities, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
DETR., 2000 Social Exclusion and the Provision andAvailability of Public Transport, DETR, London.
Dodson, J., et al., 2004 Transport Disadvantage and Social Status: A Review of literature and methods, Research Monograph 5, Urban Policy Program, Griffith University, Brisbane.
Dodson, J., and Sipe, N., 2008 Shocking the Suburbs: Oil vulnerability in the Australian city, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.
Engels, B., Nissim, R., and Landvogt, K. 2009 Under Pressure: Costs of Living, Financial Hardship and Emergency Relief in Victoria, Emergency Relief Victoria and the Victorian Council of Social Services, Melbourne.
Favreau, L., and Spear, R., 2001 Tackling Social Exclusion in Europe,Ashgate Pub., London.
Fober, S., and Grotz, R., 2006 Everybday Mobility of Elderly people in Different Urban Settings: The Example of the City of Bonn, Germany, Urban Studies, 43 (1), 99–118.
Foley, D., et al., 2002 Driving life expectancy of persons aged 70 years and older in the United States, Amercian Journal of Public Health, 92 (8), 1284–1289.
Gobbi, H. 2004 Taking its Place: A History of Oakleigh, The Oakleigh and District Historical Society, Oakleigh.
Golant, S., 1984 A Place to Grow Old: The Meaning of Environment in Old Age, Columbia University Press, New York.
Golob, T., and Hensher, D., 2007 The trip chaining activity of Sydney residents: a crosssection assessment by age group with a focus on seniors, Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 298–312.
Hensher, D., 2007 Social exclusion: Informed reality thinking on accessibility and mobility in an ageing population, In: Currie, G., Stanley, J., and Stanley, J., Eds., No way to Go: Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities, Monash University ePress, Clayton.
Herbert, D., and Smith, D., 1979 Eds., Social Problems and the City: Geographical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hine, J., and Grieco, M., 2003 Scatters and clusters in time and space; implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport, Transport Policy, 10, 299–306.
Hine, J., and Mitchell, F., 2001 Better for Everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion, Urban Studies, 38 (2) 319–322.
Hine, J., and Mitchell, F., 2003 Transport Disadvantage and Social Exclusion: Exclusionary Mechanisms in Transport in Urban Scotland, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot.
Hunri, A., 2006 Transport and social exclusion in Western Sydney, Western Sydney Community Forum and University of Western Sydney, Parramatta.
King, R., 1979 Accessibility and Behaviour in Twenty Areas of Melbourne, Research Report, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne.
King, R., 1981 Interest Rates, Energy and House Prices: Some Aspects of the Melbourne Housing Market, 1966–80, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Kirby, A., 1982 The Politics of Location: An Introduction, Methuen, London.
Knox, P., 1995 Urban Social Geography: An Introduction, 3rd edition, Longman, Harlow.
Lawton, M., 1980 Environment and Aging, Wadsworth, San Francisco.
Littlewood, P., 1999 Social Exclusion in Europe: Problems and Paradigms, Ashgate Publishing, London.
Maher, C. and O’Conner, K., 1978 Journey to Work Patterns: Melbourne 1961–1971, Working Paper, No. 6, Department of Geography, Monash University, Melbourne.
Mayers, D., and Salais, E., 2001 Eds., Social Exclusion and European Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, London.
Mees, P., 2000 A Very Public Solution: Transport in the Dispersed City, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Szeman, Z., and Tacken, M., 2005 Eds., Enhancing Mobility in Later Life: Personal Coping, Environmental Resources and Technical Support, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
Morris, J., and Rosenbloom, S. 1997 Transportation of the Elderly in Melbourne, Driving off into the Sunset: Some Myths about Ageing, Transport Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne.
Morris, J. 2007 Maintaining Mobility: The Transition from Driver to Non-Driver, Policy Framework Report, Victorian Department of Infrastructure, Melbourne.
Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., and Levitas, R., 2006 Eds., Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey, Policy Press, London.
Percy-Smith, J., 2000 Policy Responses to Social Exclusion, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Rosenbloom, S., 2001 Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: An international assessment, Transportation, 28, 375–408.
Salt, B. 2004 The Big Shift: Who we are and where we are headed, 3rd edition, Hardie Grant Books, Melbourne.
Smith, D., 1977 Human Geography: A Welfare Approach, Edward Arnold, London.
Smith, G., 1988 The Spatial Shopping Behaviour of the Urban Elderly: A Review of the Literature, Geoforum, 19 (2), 189–200.
SEU, 2003 Making the Connections: Final Report on Transport and Social Exclusion, Social Exclusion Unit, London.
Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2006 Melbourne Atlas, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Vinson, T., 2009 Social Inclusion: A Discussion Paper, Commonwealth Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Australian Government, Canberra.
WHO, http://www.who.int/ageing/en/ accessed 9/9/2011 4:58:27 PM.
Wilkinson, N., 1984 Conflict over transport in Melbourne in J. Halligan and C. Paris Eds. Australian Urban Politics: Critical Perspectives, Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, pp. 204–221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, GJ., Engels, B. (2012). Accessibility to Essential Services and Facilities by a Spatially Dispersed Aging Population in Suburban Melbourne, Australia. In: Gartner, G., Ortag, F. (eds) Advances in Location-Based Services. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24198-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24198-7_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24197-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24198-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)