Advertisement

Abstract

In architecture, the primacy of function over form was one of the core tenets of the Bauhaus School of Design. In Information Systems, function is critical, yet so many systems fail to deliver hoped for benefits. Badly designed, acquired imitatively for their symbolic, magical power, they represent a form of kitsch. To illustrate this, we describe a major national IS initiative in the UK, the Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS). Set up to ensure that only “suitable” adults would ever work with children and vulnerable adults, the Scheme became subject to increasing criticism for its intrusiveness and illiberality, and was suspended at the point of implementation in 2010. Here we expose the kitsch-ness of the Scheme as a meretricious imitation of the sort of diagnostic test used in medicine. We show how its inevitable dysfunctions outweighed its hypothetical benefits, which were largely magical and symbolic in nature. That the VBS attracted such little critical comment from IS scholars is significant, suggesting two biases (pro-business and pro-technology) in IS research which should be put right. We argue that kitsch can be combatted by practising design along principles akin to those of the Bauhaus. Our field can contribute to this, but our infatuation with theory, in itself a form of kitsch science, stands in the way of a closer relationship with practice.

Keywords

Design kitsch public services Bauhaus information systems magic 

References

  1. Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 448–469 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskerville, R.: Preparing for evidence-based management. European Journal of Information Systems 18, 523–525 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, U.: Politics of Risk Society. In: Franklin, J. (ed.) The Politics of the Risk Society, pp. 9–22. Polity Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  4. Binkley, S.: Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy. Journal of Material Culture 5, 131–152 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boland, R.J., Collopy, F.: Managing as designing. Stanford Business Books, Stanford (2004)Google Scholar
  6. Božilović, N.: Political kitsch and myth-making consciousness. Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology 6, 41–52 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J.S., Hagel, J.: Does IT matter? An HBR debate. Harvard Business Review (letters to the editor), 1–17 (June 2003) Google Scholar
  8. Desouza, K.C., Ein-Dor, P., McCubbrey, D.J., Galliers, R.D., Myers, M., Watson, R.T.: Social activism in information systems research: making the world a better place. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 19, 261–277 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Droste, M.: Bauhaus. Taschen, Hohenzollernring (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Edelman, M.: From art to politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)Google Scholar
  11. Home Office. The vetting and barring scheme guidance, Home Office report (March 2010) ISBN: 978-1-84987-202-7Google Scholar
  12. Launer, J.: Medical kitsch. Postgraduate Medical Journal 8, 111–112 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lugg, C.: Political kitsch and educational policy. In: Proceedings of the AERA Annual Convention, San Diego, pp. 1–25 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. Lugg, C.: Kitsch: from education to public policy. Falmer Press, NewYork (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Nabokov, V.: Lolita. Penguin Books, London (1955)Google Scholar
  16. Norman, D.A.: The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  17. Peters, T.: Design - innovate, differentiate, communicate. DK Publishing, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Pfeffer, J., Sutton, R.I.: Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 63–74 (January 2006)Google Scholar
  19. Reinermann, H.: The design of information systems for local administrations: from Bauhaus to Rathaus. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 11, 73–80 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Leeuuwen, T.: Introducing social semiotics. Routledge, Abingdon (2005)Google Scholar
  21. Wastell, D.G.: Managing as designing: opportunity knocks for the IS field? European Journal of Information Systems 19, 422–431 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wastell, D.G.: Managing as designing in the public services: beyond techno-magic. Triarchy Press, Axminster (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Wastell, D.G., White, S.: Facts, myths and thought-styles…. and a rallying call for civic engagement. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19, 307–318 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. White, S., Wastell, D.G.: Catching Sex Offenders: Vigilance is the Best Safeguard. In: Why We Should Scrap the Vetting Database, pp. 13–19. Manifest Club Report, London (2010)Google Scholar
  25. Wolfe, T.: From Bauhaus to Our House. Picador, New York (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Wastell
    • 1
  • Sue White
    • 2
  1. 1.Nottingham University Business SchoolNottinghamUK
  2. 2.School of Social Policy, Institute of Applied Social StudiesUniversity of BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations