Advertisement

Abstract

This paper will examine sustainability aspects of accessible information and communication technology for the private sector. First, the introduction highlights the current barriers against and drivers for barrier-free ICT. Second, the ICT scope for the further examination will be declared. Common accepted usability design clusters will be used to illustrate accessibility design principles. Regarding the impact of barrier-free ICT on sustainability aspects, three dimensions will be determined. For each dimension several positive effects, initiated by the implementation of accessible ICT, will be demonstrated.

Keywords

Accessibility ICT Accessible ICT barrier-free ICT Sustainability Barrier-free design Accessible Design 

References

  1. Abrahams, P.: Survey of attitudes to accessible ICT. Bloor Research, 2–9 (July 2009) Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B.B., Tayal, S.P., Gupta, M.: Software engineering and testing: An introduction, p. 105. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Massachusetts (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Cauchon, D.: American workforce growing grayer, published in: USA today (2010), http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-12-14-older-workers-employment_N.htm?csp=usat.me
  4. Clark, J.: Building accessible websites, p. 96 et seq. New Riders publishing, Indiana (2002)Google Scholar
  5. De Andrés, J., Lorca, P., Martínez, A.B.: Economic and Financial Factors for the Adoption and Visibility Effects of Web Accessibility:The Case of European Banks. Journal of the American society for Information science and technology 60(9), 1769–1770 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Justice (Germany). Equality Act for disabled people. Paragraph 11 (December 2007) Google Scholar
  7. Department of Justice (USA). Americans with Disabilities Act (January 1, 2009), http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm
  8. Directgov. Disabled peoples’s rights in everyday life (2010), http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/RightsAndObligations/DG_4019061
  9. Djokic, D.: Web Accessibility in the European Union, 11th Libre Software Meeting, Bordeaux, p. 18 et seq. (2010), http://bearstech.com/media/Web%20Accessibility%20in%20the%20EU%20-%20FINAL.pdf
  10. European commission, Agriculture directorate general. A Framework for indicators for the economic and social dimensions of sustainable agriculture and rural development, p. 3 (February 2001), http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/sustain/index_en.pdf
  11. Eurostat, European commission. population structure and ageing (2010), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing
  12. Eurostat, research results. 2003. Cited in OSSATE Accessibility Market and Stakeholder Analysis (2005) Google Scholar
  13. Galitz, W.O.: The essential guide to user interface design, pp. 579–584. John Wiley and sons, Inc., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  14. García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N.: Good and Bad Increases in Ecological Awareness: Environmental Differentiation Revisited. Strategic Behavior and the Environment 1, 71–72 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herzwurm, G., Mellis, W., Schockert, S., Weinberger, C.: Customer oriented evaluation of QFD Software tools, p. 5 (1997), http://www.qfd-id.de/en/articles/evaluation_tools/qfd-tools.pdf
  16. IBM. Accessibility in Web 2.0 technology (2009), http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-aj-web20/index.html
  17. Institute for energy, European commission. Code of conduct for data centres energy efficiency Version 1.0, pp. 3–7 (2008), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sustainable_growth/docs/datacenter_code-conduct.pdf
  18. Kessler, E. B., Catts, R. Survey of Americans with Disabilities (2010), http://www.2010disabilitysurveys.org/indexold.html
  19. Lányi, S.C., Forrai, S., Czank, N., Hajgató, A.: On developing validator software xvalid for testing home pages of universal design. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Coping with diversity, p. 285 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. Lehtonen, M.: The environmental social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics #49, 199–214 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decision, p. 16. Rockport publishers, Massachusetts (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Madruga, R.P.: The social dimension of sustainable development. United Nations expert meeting on National and International Cooperation for social development: Sharing of experiences and practices in social development, p. 2 (June 2002), http://www.redem.buap.mx/pdf/ramon/pichs5.pdf
  23. Marcu, M.: The EU-27 population continues to grow. In: Eurostat 2009, Population and social conditions (2009), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-QA-09-031/EN/KS-QA-09-031-EN.PDF
  24. Nga, J.K.H., Soo, N.W.M.: The influence of personal attributes on perceptions of economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. In: 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research, Paper # 72, p. 2 (2010), http://www.internationalconference.com.my/proceeding/icber2010_proceeding/PAPER_072_PersonalAttributes.pdf
  25. OneVoice for accessible ICT. Accessible ICT – Benefits to Business and Society (2010), http://www.onevoiceict.org/pdfs/Accessible%20ICT%20-%20Benefits%20to%20Business%20and%20Society.pdf
  26. Population Reference Bureau. 2010 World population Data Sheet (July 2010), http://www.prb.org/Publications/Datasheets/2010/2010wpds.aspx
  27. Pühretmair, F., Miesenberger, K.: Making sense of accessibility in IT Design - usable accessibility vs. accessible usability. In: Proceedings of the 16th international Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2005), 1529-4188/05, p. 2. IEEE Computer society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  28. Rüttimann, B.G.: Modelling Economic Globalization: A Post-Neoclassic View on Foreign Trade and Competition, pp. 17–20. Monsenstein and Vannerdat, Muenster (2007)Google Scholar
  29. Standard & Poors. Global Aging 2010: An Irreversible Truth (2010), http://www.standardandpoors.com/products-services/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245229586712
  30. Thatcher, J., Burks, M.R., Heilmann, C.: Web Accessibility –Web standards and regulatory compliance, p. 42 et seq. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  31. The European Research Group’s. Eurobarometer, 54.2/2001 (2001) Google Scholar
  32. United Nations enable. Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007), http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150
  33. Verma, N.: Business Process Management: Profiting from Process, pp. 1–4. Global India publications pvt ltd., New Delhi (2009)Google Scholar
  34. Wegge, K.P., Zimmermann, D.: Accessibility, Usability, Safety, Ergonomics, Concepts, Models and Differences. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCII 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 294–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World economic forum. ICT for economic growth: A dynamic ecosystem driving the global recovery, pp. 1–7 (2009), https://members.weforum.org/pdf/ict/ICT%20for%20Growth.pdf
  36. W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (December 11, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daryoush Daniel Vaziri
    • 1
  1. 1.University of applied science Bonn-Rhein-SiegSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations