Improving the Applicability of Environmental Scanning Systems: State of the Art and Future Research

  • Jörg H. Mayer
  • Neon Steinecke
  • Reiner Quick
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 366)

Abstract

The 2008/2009 economic crisis provided a sustainable impulse for improving environmental scanning systems (ESS). Although a rich body of know-ledge exists, concepts are not often used in practice. This article contributes a literature review addressing six findings for ESS design to become more applicable than the state of the art. They are structured by the elements of information systems (IS) design theories. Addressing the lack of a sound requirements analysis, our first finding proposes 360-degree ESS for executives’ "managing a company" task and presents how to select just the most important scanning areas to keep focus. Three other findings cover the IS model perspective focusing on a better "grasp" of weak signals: define concrete indicators and use IT to identify relevant cause-effective-chains, leverage IT to automate day-to-day routines and monitor the variety of indicators’ movements, and—as a fourth finding—leverage expert experience with an impact matrix and translate indicators’ impact into a balanced opportunity-and-threat portfolio. From the methods perspective on ESS, we propose to more closely incorporate scanning results into executives’ decision-making process by generating scenarios from a set of environment assumptions as well as to use retrospective controls to continuously update the ESS and collaborate to share the scanning findings day-to-day.

Keywords

Corporate management balanced chance and risk management information and communication technology (ICT) literature review 

References

  1. Aguilar, F.J.: Scanning the Business Environment. Macmillan, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  2. Albright, K.S.: Environmental scanning: radar for success. The Information Management Journal 38(3), 38–45 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Ansoff, H.I.: Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals. California Management Review 18(2), 21–32 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Ansoff, H.I.: Strategic Issue Management. Strategic Management Journal 1(2), 131–148 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decision Support Systems 44(3), 657–672 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choo, C.W.: Information Use and Early Warning Effectiveness: Perspectives and Prospects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(5), 1071–1082 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhury, V., Sampler, J.L.: Information Specificity and Environmental Scan-ning: An Economic Perspective. MIS Quarterly 21(1), 25–53 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciborra, C.: Notes in Improvisation and Time in Organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9(2), 77–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark Jr., T.D., Jones, M.C., Armstrong Curtis, P.: The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction. MIS Quarterly 31(3), 579–615 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J.B., Zinsbarg, E.D.: Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management. Dow Jones-Irwing Inc., Homewood (1967)Google Scholar
  11. Daft, R.L., Sormunen, J., Parks, D.: Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study. Strategic Management Journal 9(2), 123–139 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalkey, N.C.: The Delphi Method: An experimental study of group opinion. Rand, Santa Monica (1969)Google Scholar
  13. Davies, J., Finlay, M., McLenaghen, T., Wilson, D.: Key Risk Indicators – Their Role in Operational Risk Management and Measurement. In: ARM and RiskBusiness International, Prague, pp. 1–32 (2006) Google Scholar
  14. Day, G.S., Schoemaker, P.J.H.: Driving through the Fog: Managing at the Edge. Long Range Planning 37(2), 127–142 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, G.S., Schoemaker, P.J.H.: Scanning The Periphery. Harvard Business Review 83(11), 135–148 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Duncan, R.B.: Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(3), 313–327 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El Sawy, O.A.: Personal Information Systems for Strategic Scanning in Turbulent Environments: Can the CEO Go On-Line? MIS Quarterly 9(1), 53–60 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elofson, G., Konsynski, B.: Delegation technologies: Environmental scanning with intelligent agents. Journal of Management Information Systems 8(1), 37–62 (1991)Google Scholar
  19. Fahey, L., King, W.R.: Environmental Scanning for Corporate Planning. Business Horizons 20(4), 61 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fontela, E.: Industrial Applications of Cross-Impact Analysis. Long Range Planning 9(4), 29–33 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frolick, M.N., Parzinger, M.J., Rainer Jr., R.K., Ramarapu, N.K.: Using EISs for environmental scanning. Information Systems Management 14(1), 35–40 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuld, L.: Be Prepared. Harvard Business Review 81(11), 20–21 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. Hand, D.J.: Mining the past to determine the future: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of Forecasting 25(5), 441–451 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopwood, A.G.: The economic crisis and accounting: Implications for the research community. Accounting, Organizations & Society 34(6/7), 797–802 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IEEE 1990. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. - Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE Computer Society, New York (1990) Google Scholar
  27. Kajüter, P.: Die Regulierung des Risikomanagements im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management 47(Sonderheft 3), 12–25 (2004) Google Scholar
  28. Kotonya, G., Sommerville, I.: Requirements Engineering Processes and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken (1998)Google Scholar
  29. Krystek, U., Herzhoff, M.: Szenario-Technik und Frühaufklärung: Anwendungs-stand und Integrationspotential. Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management 50(5), 305–310 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. Lenz, R.T., Engledow, J.L.: Environmental Analysis Units and Strategic Decision-making: a Field Study of Selected “Leading-edge” Corporations. Strategic Management Journal 7(1), 69–89 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lesca, N., Caron-Fasan, M.-L.: Strategic scanning project failure and abandonment factors: Lessons learned. European Journal of Information Systems 17(4), 371–386 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Makridakis, S., Hogarth, R.M., Gaba, A.: Why Forecasts Fail. What to Do Instead. MIT Sloan Management Review 51(2), 83–90 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, J.H.: Managing the Future–Six Guidelines for Designing Environmental Scanning Systems. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 276–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayer, J.H.: Organisatorische Veränderungen durch die aktuelle Wirtschaftskrise – Bestandsaufnahme und Implikationen für Unternehmenssteuerungssysteme. In: Proceedings des 25. Deutschen Controlling Congresses, Dortmund, Deutschland, pp. 209–228 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. Mayer, J.H., Wurl, H.-J.: Strategische Früherkennung in internationalen Konzernen, pp. 1–28. University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2011)Google Scholar
  36. MIS Journal Ranking (AIS 2007), http://ais.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=432 (accessed January 17, 2011)
  37. Narchal, R.M., Kittappa, K., Bhattacharya, P.: An Environmental Scanning System for Business Planning. Long Range Planning 20(6), 96–105 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paech, B., Kerkow, D.: Non-Functional Requirements Engineering - Quality is Essential. In: 10th Anniversary International Workshio on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2004), Riga, Latvia, pp. 27–40 (2004)Google Scholar
  39. Power, D.J.: Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  40. Rockfellow, J.D.: Wild Cards Preparing for “The Big One”. The Futurist 28(1), 14–19 (1994)Google Scholar
  41. Sherman, W.S., Chambers, V.: SOX as Safeguard and Signal: The Impact of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on US Corporations’ Choice to List Abroad. The Multinational Business Review 17(3), 163–179 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taleb, N.N., Goldstein, D.G., Spitznagel, M.W.: The Six Mistakes Executives Make in Risk Management. Harvard Business Review 87(10), 78–81 (2009)Google Scholar
  43. Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., Riempp, G.: The State of Research on Information Systems Success – A Review of Existing Multidimensional Approaches. Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE) 1(4), 315–325 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process. In: 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Verona, Italy, pp. 2206–2217 (2009) Google Scholar
  45. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26(2), xiii-xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  47. Wixom, B.H., Watson, H.J.: The BI-based organization. International Journal of Business Intelligence 1(1), 13–28 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. WKWI. WI-Liste der Konferenzen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(2), 155–163 (2008)Google Scholar
  49. Xu, X.M., Kaye, G.R., Duan, Y.: UK executives vision on business environment for information scanning A cross industry study. Information & Management 40(5), 381–389 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yasai-Ardenaki, M., Nystrom, P.C.: Designs for Environmental Scanning Systems: Tests of a Contingency Theory. Management Science 42(2), 187–204 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg H. Mayer
    • 1
  • Neon Steinecke
    • 2
  • Reiner Quick
    • 2
  1. 1.University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Darmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations