Advertisement

Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Behavior of Fiber Composites

  • H. Bansemir
Conference paper

Abstract

The outstanding fatigue tolerance features of composite structures were the reason for introducing composite rotor blades in the helicopter design. One goal was to eliminate dynamically loaded metallic hinges. In 1967, the BO 105, a product of the former helicopter division of MBB, now Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH, flew for the first time. Its hingeless rotor was the first serial design with composite blades. Later in 1996, the EC 135 was certified according to the latest damage tolerance and fatigue certification rules. As a consequent design improvement this helicopter has a sophisticated modern rotor without any hinges and bearings. The EC 135 with the “Flexbeam-Rotor” including the bending and torsion element is shown in Fig. 1. More than 1000 helicopters have been produced until today. [Bansemir, Müller: The EC 135...].

The new American and European certification rules concerning fatigue and damage tolerance of composite structure include the establishment of replacement times and inspection intervals [“Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation...”]:

Replacement times must be demonstrated by tests or by analysis supported by tests, to ensure that the structure is able to withstand the repeated loads of variable magnitude expected in service. In establishing replacement times, the following items must be considered: Damage identified by threats, Maximum acceptable manufacturing defects and service damages, Ultimate load strength capability must be shown after application of repeated loads.

Inspection intervals must be established to ensure that any damage identified that may occur from fatigue and/or other in-service causes will be detected before it has grown to the extent that the required residual strength capability cannot be achieved. The minimum required residual strength is limit load.

[Emmerling: New Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Evaluation Rules...]. The residual strength capability must include the ability to resist the influence of temperature and moisture as well as impacts. The Wöhler curves (SN curves) of composites are usually relatively flat and the influence of notches on high cycle-fatigue is not important. There is no influence of corrosion fretting.

Keywords

Fibre Composite Residual Strength Damage Tolerance Carbon Composite Repeated Load 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jarosch, E., Stepan, A.: Fatigue Properties and Test Procedures of Glass Reinforced Plastic Rotorblades, American Helicopter Society. 25th Annual National Forum, Paper No. 370 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Och, F.: Fatigue Strength. AGARDograph No. 292. Helicopter Fatigue Design Guide (November 1983); ISBN: 92-835-0341-4Google Scholar
  3. Weiß, W., Auer, P.: Properties of Glass and Carbon Fibre Fabrics used in Helicopter Rotors. In: 10th European Rotorcraft Forum, The Hague, The Netherlands, August 28-31 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Bansemir, H., Emmerling, S.: Fatigue Substantiation and Damage Tolerance Evaluation of Fibre Composite Helicopter Components. In: Applied Vehicle Technology Panel: Applications of Damage Tolerance Principles for Improved Airworthiness of Rotorcraft, Corfu, Greece (1999)Google Scholar
  5. Weinert, A., Gergely, P.: Fatigue-Strength Surface – Basis for Structural Analysis under Dynamic Loads. In: DLRK-2011 in Bremen, September 27-29 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Emmerling, S.: New Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Evaluation Rules – Are we fit for them? In: 37th European Rotorcraft Forum in Vergiate/Callarate, Italy, September 13-15 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Composite Rotorcraft Structures. NPRM No. 09–12 (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) for FAR 27/29.573 Federal Register, vol. 75(3), (January 6, 2010) Proposed Rule Google Scholar
  8. Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Rotorcraft Structures. NPA No. 2010-04 (Notice of Proposed Amendment) for CS-27/29.573 (April 29, 2010)Google Scholar
  9. Bansemir, H., Mueller, R.: The EC135 – Applied Advanced Technology. In: AHS, 53rd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, USA, April 29-May 1 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. Handbuch für Strukturberechnung, Ausgabe CIASB (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Schürmann, H.: Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consulting for CompositesLight Weight Structures and Knowledge ManagementMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations