Advertisement

Intrinsic vulnerability assessment using a modified version of the PI Method: A case study in the Boeotia region, Central Greece

  • E. Tziritis
  • N. Evelpidou
Part of the Environmental Earth Sciences book series (EESCI)

Abstract

The assessment of an aquifers’ vulnerability to pollution is of great importance, and can be used as a tool to augment planning, effective protection and management of groundwater resources’ quality, especially in the case of karstic aquifers. The present study aims to assess the intrinsic vulnerability of a karstic groundwater system, with the use of a modified version of the PI method. The assessments are functional to the effectiveness of the protective cover, as well as to the degree to which the protective cover is bypassed due to flow conditions. The used data was obtained by field work, empirical and semi-quantitative approaches regarding lithology, fissuring and karstification of bedrock, soil characteristics, hydrology, hydrogeology, topography and vegetation. The combinational effect of the above parameters, as processed with the aid of a GIS system, yielded the final calculation of the protection factor (π) and subsequently the vulnerability of the aquifer to pollution.

Keywords

Karstic Aquifer Piezometric Level Protective Cover Topographic Slope Aquifer Vulnerability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. European Water Directive (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hotzl H. (2000) The PI method – a GIS based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z.angew.Geol., 46(2000)3, p.157-166Google Scholar
  3. Holting B, Haertle T, Hohberger K, Nachtigall K, Villinger E, Weinzierl W, Wrobel JP. (1995) Konzept zur ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der Grundwasseruberdeckung. Geol. Jb. C63, p.5-24Google Scholar
  4. Tziritis E. (2008) Hydrogeochemical - Environmental study of east Kopaida – Yliki karstic system and assessment of vulnerability with the use of Geoinformatics. PhD thesis, University of Athens, Faculty of Geology & GeoenvironmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Vrba J, Zaporozec A. (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to Hydrogeology (IAH), v.16, p.131Google Scholar
  6. Zwahlen F. (2003) Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report (COST action 620). European Commission, Directorate-General XII Science, Research and Development, Brussels, 297ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Tziritis
    • 1
  • N. Evelpidou
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Geology and GeoenvironmentNational & Kapodistrian University of AthensIlissia, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations