[′beɾɚ] or [′betə]? Do Polish Learners of English Accommodate their Pronunciation? A Pilot Study

Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

One does not have to be a linguist to notice that a person’s speech varies with relation to who one is talking to. In the same manner that people often find themselves speaking more slowly and clearly while addressing a foreigner or an elderly person, one will use different language when engaging in casual conversation with friends and when discussing account details with a bank official. To interpret and justify these shifts in communicative behaviour, Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) may be applied. Although CAT focuses primarily on interactions between native speakers of a given language, there have been several studies which suggest that the theory may also be applied to variation in non-native communicative behaviour (Zuengler 1991). The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether Polish learners of English accommodate to different English accents. To examine the applicability of CAT in such interactions, a pilot study on 4 first year English philology students was conducted, each of which was interviewed first by an RP and later a Canadian English speaker. The two dependent variables under investigation were tapping and rhoticity. Although the factors which affect the presence or absence of accommodation remain uncertain, the results of this pilot study indicate that some Polish English speakers may accommodate to different accents. It was also observed that tapping appears quite frequently in the speech of the informants selected, which seems to be a result of extensive exposure to American English (tv, cinema, music) rather than an indication of convergence towards any of the interlocutors. The pilot study has also provided some valuable insight into ways of improving the methodology of examining accommodation in native/non-native interactions.

Keywords

Native Speaker Lexical Item Communicative Behaviour Function Word British National Corpus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beebe, Leslie. 1981. Social and situational factors affecting the strategy of dialect code-switching. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 32:139–149Google Scholar
  2. Beebe, Leslie and Giles, Howard. 1984. Speech accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:5–32Google Scholar
  3. Bourhis, Richard, Giles, Howard and Taylor, Donald. 1973. Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data. Language in Society 2:177–192Google Scholar
  4. Collins, Beverly and Mees, Inger. 2008. Practical phonetics and phonology. A resource book for students. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Coupland, Nikolas and Jaworski, Adam. 1997. Relevance, accommodation and conversation: Modeling the social dimension of communication. Mutlilingua 16:235–258Google Scholar
  6. Giles, Howard and Ogay, Tania. 2007. Communication Accommodation Theory. In Wendy Samter and Bryan Whaley, (eds) Explaining communication. Contemporary theories and exemplars. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: 325–244Google Scholar
  7. Skockey, Linda. 2003. Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
  8. Wells, John Christopher. 1986. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Wells, John Christopher. 2011. details. John Wells’s phonetic blog. (http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/2011/09/details.html). [Last accessed 22nd February 2012]
  10. Zuengler, Jane. 1991. Accommodation in native-nonnative interactions: Going beyond the “what” to the “why” in second language research. In Justine Coupland, Nikolas Coupland and Howard Giles (eds) Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 223–245Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ŁódźŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations