Advertisement

Towards an Adaptive Supervision of Distributed Systems

  • Cédric Herpson
  • Vincent Corruble
  • Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 382)

Abstract

The traditional, centralized, approach to supervision is challenged when communications between supervision and supervised systems become either slow, disrupted or too costly. To obtain a supervision system that is able to dynamically adapt itself to the communications’ state, we propose to distribute the supervision process through several autonomous agents. To evaluate our approach, we made experiments on a simulator for distributed systems using three different supervision approaches. Results show that our agent’s decision model does lead to a relevant autonomous supervision in distributed systems where a short response time prevails over a limited repair extra-cost.

Keywords

Short Response Time Execution Cost Precedence Graph Supervision System Supervise System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Betta, G., Pietrosanto, A.: Instrument fault detection and isolation: state of the art and new research trends (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dagum, P., Galper, A., Horvitz, E.: Dynamic network models for forecasting. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 41–48 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fabre, E., Benveniste, A., Jard, C.: Distributed diagnosis for large discrete event dynamic systems. In: IRISA (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fröhlich, P., Nejdl, W.: Resolving conflicts in distributed diagnosis. In: ECAI Workshop on Modelling Conflicts in AI (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen, E.A., Zilberstein, S.: Monitoring and control of anytime algorithms: A dynamic programming approach. Artificial Intelligence 126, 139–157 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herpson, C., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Corruble, V.: An agent decision model for an adaptive supervision of distributed systems. In: Proc. of EPIA 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horling, B., Lesser, V., Vincent, R., Bazzan, A., Xuan, P.: Diagnosis as an integral part of multi-agent adaptability. Technical report (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horvitz, E., Rutledge, G.: Time-dependent utility and action under uncertainty. In: Proc. of UAI, pp. 151–158 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalech, M., Pfeffer, A.: Decision making with dynamically arriving information. In: Proceddings of AAMAS (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kouvelis, P., Yu, G.: Robust discrete optimization and its applications. Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lafortune, S., Teneketzis, D., Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Sinnamohideen, K.R.: Failure diagnosis of dynamic systems: an approach based on discrete event systems. In: Proc. American Control Conference, June 25-27, vol. 3, pp. 2058–2071 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nejdl, W., Werner, M.: Distributed intelligent agents for control, diagnosis and repair. RWTH Aachen, Informatik, Tech. Rep. (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roos, N., Teije, A.T., Bos, A., Witteveen, C.: An analysis of multi-agent diagnosis. In: AAMAS, pp. 986–987 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wörn, H., Längle, T., Albert, M., Kazi, A., Brighenti, A., Revuelta Seijo, S., Senior, C., Bobi, M.A.S., Collado, J.V.: Diamond: distributed multi-agent architecture for monitoring and diagnosis. Production Planning & Control 15, 189–200 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cédric Herpson
    • 1
  • Vincent Corruble
    • 1
  • Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni
    • 1
  1. 1.LIP6Université Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations