Empirical Evaluation of Computational Emotional Contagion Models
In social psychology, emotional contagion describes the widely observed phenomenon of one person’s emotions being influenced by surrounding people’s emotions. While the overall effect is agreed upon, the underlying mechanism of the spread of emotions has seen little quantification and application to computational agents despite extensive evidence of its impacts in everyday life.
In this paper, we examine computational models of emotional contagion by implementing two models ( and ) that draw from two separate lines of contagion research: thermodynamics-based and epidemiological-based. We first perform sensitivity tests on each model in an evacuation simulation, ESCAPES, showing both models to be reasonably robust to parameter variations with certain exceptions. We then compare their ability to reproduce a real crowd panic scene in simulation, showing that the thermodynamics-style model () produces superior results due to the ill-suited contagion mechanism at the core of epidemiological models. We also identify that a graduated effect of fear and proximity-based contagion effects are key to producing the superior results. We then reproduce the methodology on a second video, showing that the same results hold, implying generality of the conclusions reached in the first scene.
KeywordsEmotional Contagion Contagion Effect Contagion Model Virtual Patient Virtual Agent
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Barsade, S.G., Gibson, D.E.: Group Emotion: A View from Top and Bottom. In: Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E., Neale, M. (eds.) Research on Managing on Groups and Teams, pp. 81–102. JAI Press, Stamford (1998)Google Scholar
- 2.Bosse, T., Duell, R., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J., Wal, C.N.V.D.: A Multi-Agent Model for Mutual Absorption of Emotions. In: European Council on Modeling and Simulation, ECMS 2009, pp. 212–218 (2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Bosse, T., Hoogendoorn, M., Klein, M., Treur, J., van der Wal, N.: Agent-Based Analysis of Patterns in Crowd Behaviour Involving Contagion of Mental States. In: IEA/AIE 2011, Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
- 5.Diamond, J., McVay, M., Zavala, M.W.: Quick, Safe, Secure: Addressing Human Behavior During Evacuations at LAX. Master’s thesis, UCLA Dept of Public Policy (June 2010)Google Scholar
- 7.Doherty, W.: The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21(2) (1997)Google Scholar
- 8.Durupinar, F.: From Audiences to Mobs: Crowd Simulation with Psychological Factors. PhD dissertation, Bilkent University, Dept. Comp. Eng (July 2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., Rapson, R.L.: Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
- 16.Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (1962)Google Scholar
- 18.Tsai, J., Fridman, N., Bowring, E., Brown, M., Epstein, S., Kaminka, G., Marsella, S., Ogden, A., Rika, I., Sheel, A., Taylor, M.E., Wang, X., Zilka, A., Tambe, M.: ESCAPES: Evacuation Simulation with Children, Authorities, Parents, Emotions, and Social Comparison. In: AAMAS 2011, pp. 457–464. ACM Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar