“I Like Your Shirt” - Dialogue Acts for Enabling Social Talk in Conversational Agents

  • Tina Klüwer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6895)

Abstract

This paper presents a set of dialogue acts which can be used to implement small talk conversations in conversational agents. Although many conversational agents are supposed to engage in small talk, no systematic development of social dialogue acts and sequences for dialogue systems was made so far. Instead systems reuse the same conversation sequence every time they engage in small talk or integrate stateless chatbots without any knowledge about the ongoing conversation. The small talk dialogue act taxonomy presented in this paper consists of functionally motivated acts inspired by the social science work of “face”. Moreover, a corpus annotation and possible dialogue act sequences extracted from this annotated corpus are described. The dialogue act set and the sequences are used in our dialogue system to provide a more knowledge-driven treatment of small talk than chatbots can offer.

Keywords

Virtual World Dialogue System Social Talk Request Information Annotate Corpus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, J., Core, M.: DAMSL: Dialogue Act Markup in Several Layers (Draft 2.1) (1997), http://www.cs.rochester.edu/research/cisd/resources/damsl/RevisedManual/
  2. 2.
    Bertomeu, N., Benz, A.: Annotation of joint projects and information states in human-npc dialogues. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (CILC 2009), Murcia, Spain (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bickmore, T.: Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickmore, T.: A Computational Model of Small Talk (1999), http://web.media.mit.edu/~bickmore/Mas962b/
  5. 5.
    Bickmore, T.W., Cassell, J.: ”How about this weather?” Social Dialog with Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bickmore, T.W., Cassell, J.: Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: CHI, pp. 396–403 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bickmore, T.W., Picard, R.W.: Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-human Interaction 12, 293–327 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blascovich, J.: A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, CVE 2002, pp. 25–30. ACM, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brinker, K., Sager, S.F.: Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Erich Schmidt Verlag (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunt, H.: Multifunctionality in dialogue. Comput. Speech Lang 25, 222–245 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bunt, H., Alexandersson, J., Carletta, J., Choe, J.-W., Fang, A.C., Hasida, K., Lee, K., Petukhova, V., Popescu-Belis, A., Romary, L., Soria, C., Traum, D.: Towards an ISO Standard for Dialogue Act Annotation. In: Calzolari, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H.: Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is the Limit, CHI 1999, pp. 520–527. ACM, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coupland, J., Coupland, N., Robinson, J.D.: “How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society 21(02), 207–230 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endrass, B., Rehm, M., Andre, E.: Planning Small Talk Behavior with Cultural Influences for Multiagent Systems. Computer Speech and Language 25(2), 158–174 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goffman, E.: Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City (1967)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goffman, E.: Relations in public; Microstudies of the public order. Basic Books, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Academic Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holly, W.: Imagearbeit in Gesprächen. Zur linguistischen Beschreibung des Beziehungsaspekts. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 18, Niemeyer, Tübingen (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isbister, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishida, T., Nass, C.: Helper Agent: Designing An Assistant for Human-Human Interaction in a Virtual Meeting Space, pp. 57–64 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jurafsky, D., Schriberg, E., Biasca, D.: Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shall-Discourse-Function Annotation Coders Manual (1997), http://stripe.colorado.edu/~jurafsky/manual.august.html
  21. 21.
    Klüwer, T.: RMRSBot – Using Linguistic Information to Enrich a Chatbot. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5773, pp. 515–516. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A conversational agent as museum guide – design and evaluation of a real-world application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malinowski, B.: The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In: The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, 10th edn., pp. 296–336. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Computer Human Interaction (1994)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schegloff, E.A.: Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schneider, K.: Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Philipps-Universitat, Marburg, Germany (1988)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shriberg, E., Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Ang, J., Carvey, H.: The ICSI meeting recorder dialog act (MRDA) corpus. In: Proc. of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 97–100 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina Klüwer
    • 1
  1. 1.German Research Centre for Artificial IntelligenceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations