Experimental Verification of the Effectiveness of Mammography Testing Description’s Standardization

  • Teresa Podsiadły-Marczykowska
  • Rafał Zawiślak
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 364)

Abstract

The article presents assumptions, and results of a test of experimental verification of a hypothesis stating that the use of the MammoEdit - a tool that uses its own ontology and the embedded knowledge of mammography – increase the diagnostic accuracy as well as the reproducibility of mammographic interpretation. The graphical user interface of the editor was similarly assessed, as well as the rules for visualization which assists the radiologist in the interpretation of the lesions’ character.

Keywords

mammogram interpretation biomedical engineering ontology breast scanning cancer diagnostics 

References

  1. 1.
    Podsiadły-Marczykowska, T., Zawiślak, R.: The role of domain ontology in the design of editor for mammography reports. Dziedzinowa ontologia mammografii w projektowaniu edytora raportów, Bazy Danych: Struktury, Algorytmy, Metody, ch. 37 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miglioretti, D.L., Smith-Bindman, R., Abraham, L., Brenner, R.J., Carney, P.A., et al.: Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Performance of Diagnostic Mammography. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 1854–1863 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swets, J.A.: ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging tests. Invest. Radiol. 14, 109–121 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou, X.H., Obuchowski, N.A., Obuchowski, D.M.: Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obuchowski, N.A., Beiden, S.V., Berbaum, K.S., Stephen, L., Hillis, S.L.: Multireader, Multicase Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: An Empirical Comparison of Five Methods. Acad. Radiol. 11, 980–995 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S., Lenth, R.V., Chen, Y.F., Donaghy, B.A.: Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design. Acad. Radiol. 5, 591–602 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pesce, L.L., Metz, C.E.: Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of “proper” binormal ROC curves. Acad. Radiol. 14(7), 814–882 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Podsiadły-Marczykowska
    • 1
  • Rafał Zawiślak
    • 2
  1. 1.Instytut Biocybernetyki i Inżynierii Biomedycznej PANWarszawaPoland
  2. 2.Politechnika Łódzka, Instytut AutomatykiŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations