Handling Partial Preferences in the Belief AHP Method: Application to Life Cycle Assessment

  • Amel Ennaceur
  • Zied Elouedi
  • Eric Lefevre
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6934)

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel multi-criteria decision making method under uncertainty that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the belief function theory. Our method, named belief AHP, allows the expert to express incomplete and imprecise information about groups of alternatives instead of single ones. On the other hand and in order to judge the importance of criteria, he can also present his opinions on groups of criteria. Then, the uncertainty will be taken into account in the final decision. Finally, another purpose of this paper is also to solve a real application problem which deals with the PVC life cycle assessment.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment Analytic Hierarchy Process Belief Function Multicriteria Decision Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Basak, I.: Probabilistic judgments specified partially in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 108, 153–164 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beynon, M., Curry, B., Morgan, P.: The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: An alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling. OMEGA 28(1), 37–50 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joaquin, P.: Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(6), 1073–1076 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laarhoven, P.V., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 199–227 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smets, P.: The application of the Transferable Belief Model to diagnostic problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 13, 127–158 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 447–458 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smets, P.: Transferable Belief Model for expert judgments and reliability problems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 38, 59–66 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The Transferable Belief Model. Artificial Intelligence 66, 191–234 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeleny, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amel Ennaceur
    • 1
  • Zied Elouedi
    • 1
  • Eric Lefevre
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut Supérieur de Gestion de TunisUniversity of TunisLe Bardo, TunisTunisia
  2. 2.Univ. Lille Nord of France, UArtoisFrance

Personalised recommendations