Skip to main content

Software Logical Structure Verification Method by Modeling Implemented Specification

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6883))

  • 2053 Accesses

Abstract

In component testing for a single function, a functional black box testing based on specification of the function and a white box testing based on the program structure are performed. However, It is difficult to verify a logical correctness of the program by these testing methods. In this paper, a novel verification method to achieve it is proposed. Conventional testing usually compares output from program with expected output, our method models the function specification and the implemented specification as a Decision Table format, then compare them. We applied this method to some commercial programs. As a result, we could verify correctness of the logics implemented in the programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ISTQB, Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus, version 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, C.: A Practitioner’s Guide to Software Test Design. Artech House, Boston (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beizer, B.: Software Testing Techniques, 2nd edn. International Thomson Computer Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, L.A.: A system to generate test data and symbolically execute programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2(3), 215–222 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: DART: Directed automated random testing. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN 2005 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sen, K., Marinov, D., Agha, G.: CUTE: A concolic unit testing engine for C. In: 5th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2005). ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burnim, J., Sen, K.: Heuristics for Dynamic Test Generation (short paper). In: 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. http://code.google.com/p/crest/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Uetsuki, K., Matsuodani, T., Tsuda, K. (2011). Software Logical Structure Verification Method by Modeling Implemented Specification. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23854-3_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23854-3_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23853-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23854-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics