Comparison Analysis of Video Game Purchase Factors between Japanese and American Consumers

  • Kodai Kitami
  • Ryosuke Saga
  • Kazunori Matsumoto
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6883)

Abstract

This paper describes a comparison analysis of video game purchase factors between Japanese and American consumers. The Japanese game industry’s growth has been sluggish recently, and Japanese video game publishers have been focusing on foreign markets. To develop a best-seller, the publishers must understand consumers’ psychological purchase factors such as ideas and preference. However, traditional studies have not analyzed consumers’ latent psychological purchase factors. Therefore, we extract efficient information for developing best-selling video games for domestic and foreign consumers by comparing purchase factor models of Japanese and American consumers. In this experiment, we construct six purchase factor models of Japanese and American consumers by using a creativity technique, and we analyze the purchase factor differences between consumer groups. The results indicate that Japanese consumers tend to pay attention to publisher brand, whereas American consumers attach importance to game platform and expansion of games.

Keywords

Purchase factor model Creativity technique Structural equation modeling KJ method Causal analysis Video games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Igda Japan: Textbook of digital games. SoftBank Creative (2010) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Media Create: Video game industry white paper 2011. Media Create (2011) (in Japanese). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibrahim, R., Wills, G., Gilbert, L.: deGendering games: Towards a gender-inclusive framework for games. In: MCCSIS 2010, pp. 127–130 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams, D.: Structure and competition in the U.S. home video game industry. The International Journal on Media Management 4(1), 41–45 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kotler, P., Keller, L.P.: A Framework for Marketing Management, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, London (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearl, J.: Causality, Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitami, K., Saga, R.: Causality Analysis for Best Seller of Software Game by Regression and Structural Equation Modeling. In: IEEE SMC 2010, pp. 1495–1500 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Famitsu.com, http://www.famitsu.com/ (in Japanese)
  9. 9.
    Enter Brain: Famitsu game white paper 2009. Enter Brain (2009) (in Japanese). Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ESA: Essential facts about the computer and video game industry (2010), http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_Essential_Facts_2010.PDF
  11. 11.
    Bayus, L.B.: Word of Mouth: The Indirect Effects of Marketing Efforts. Journal of Advertising Research, 31–39 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freedman, D., Pisani, R., Purves, R.: Statistics. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loehlin, C.J.: Latent variable models—an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press, San Diego (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic graphical models—principles and techniques. The MIT press, Cambridge (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toyoda, H.: Structural Equation Modeling: Introduction. Asakura Publishing Co. (1998) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saga, R., Kitami, K., Matsumoto, K.: Graphical modeling by creativity method for structural equation modeling. In: The Proceedings of Japan-Cambodia Joint Symposium on Information Systems and Communication Technology 2011, pp. 51–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawakita, J.: Way of thinking: For creativity development. Chuokoron-Shinsha.Ink (1967) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garfield, J.M., Taylor, J.N., Dennis, R.A., Satzinger, W.J.: Research Report: Modifying Paradigms—Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques, and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation. Information Systems Research 12(3), 332–333 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silverstein, D., Samuel, P., Decarlo, N.: The innovator’s toolkit. Breakthrough Management Group International (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kitami, K., Saga, R., Matsumoto, K.: Validation for model construction process by using creativity method. In: IADIS Information Systems 2011, pp. 362–364 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    PlayStation mk2, http://www.psmk2.net/
  22. 22.
    IGN Entertainment Games, http://www.ign.com/
  23. 23.
    The R Project for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org/
  24. 24.
    Game Compass, http://gcompass.sp.land.to/ (in Japanese)
  25. 25.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kodai Kitami
    • 1
  • Ryosuke Saga
    • 2
  • Kazunori Matsumoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringKanagawa Institute of TechnologyAtsugiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Information and Computer ScienceKanagawa Institute of TechnologyAtsugiJapan

Personalised recommendations