Advertisement

Are First Impressions about Websites Only Related to Visual Appeal?

  • Eleftherios Papachristos
  • Nikolaos Avouris
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6946)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether immediate impression about websites influences only perceptions of attractiveness. The evaluative constructs of perceived usability, credibility and novelty were investigated alongside visual appeal in an experimental setting in which users evaluated 20 website screenshots in two phases. The websites were rated by the participants after viewing time of 500 ms in the first phase and with no time limit in the second. Within-website and within-rater consistency were examined in order to determine whether extremely short time period are enough to quickly form stable opinions about high level evaluative constructs besides visual appeal. We confirmed that quick and stable visual appeal judgments were made without the need of elaborate investigations and found evidence that this is also true for novelty. Usability and credibility judgments were found less consistent but nonetheless noteworthy.

Keywords

Webpage design aesthetic evaluation credibility visual appeal perceived usability 

References

  1. 1.
    Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G.J., Dudek, C., Brownet, J.: Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2), 115–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., Sharfi, T.: Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 64(11), 1071–1083 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Thinks. Basic Books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19(4), 319–349 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60(3), 269–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norman, D.A.: Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Human-Computer Interaction 19(4), 311–318 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fogg, B.G., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.: How do people evaluate a Web site’s credibility? Results from a large study. Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University, http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityre-search/stanfordPTL_TOC.htm
  8. 8.
    Coates, D.: Watches tell more than time: product design, information and the quest for elegance. McGraw-Hill, London (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papachristos, E., Avouris, N.: The Subjective and Objective Nature of Website Aesthetic Impressions. In: Gross, T., et al. (eds.) INTERACT 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 119–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassili, J.N.: The how and why of response latency measurement in telephone surveys. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pham, M.T., Cohen, J.B., Pracejus, J.W., Hughes, G.D.: Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research 28, 167–188 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleftherios Papachristos
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Avouris
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction Group, Electrical and Computer Eng. Dept.University of PatrasRio PatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations