Analysing the Playground: Sensitizing Concepts to Inform Systems That Promote Playful Interaction

  • Stefan Rennick Egglestone
  • Brendan Walker
  • Joe Marshall
  • Steve Benford
  • Derek McAuley
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6946)


Playful interaction in an important topic in HCI research, and there is an ongoing debate about the fundamental principles that underpin playful systems. This paper makes a contribution to this debate by outlining a set of sensitizing concepts which have emerged from an analysis of interaction in the playground; these help explain its appeal to children, and have been selected for their potential to inspire the design of future playful systems. These concepts have emerged from the analysis of material collected during a structured workshop which was organized by the authors, and which was attended by a group of experts. They have also been applied to the design of Breathless, a playful interactive system which has recently been deployed by the authors, and which represents an unusual evolution of the playground swing. The paper concludes with a number of reflections inspired by Breathless. These have been structured through the use of the concepts as an analytical tool.


Playground playful interaction sensitizing concepts 


  1. 1.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. The Beacon Press, Boston (1950)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaver, W.: Designing for Homo Ludens. I3 Magazine (12) (2002) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bekker, T., Sturm, J., Eggen, B.: Designing playful interaction for social interaction and physical play. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 385–396 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielsen, R., Fritsch, J., Halskov, K., Brynskov, M.: Out of the box: exploring the richness of children’s use of an interactive table. In: 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2009) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kizony, R., Katz, N., Weiss, P.: Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 14, 261–268 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Online guide to the use of the Nintendo Wii in physical rehabilitation,
  7. 7.
    Walker, B., Schnädelbach, H., Rennick Egglestone, S., Clarke, A., Ng, M., Wright, M., Rodden, T., Benford, S., French, A.: Augmenting amusement rides with telemetry. In: International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (2007) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall, J., Rowland, D., Rennick Egglestone, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., McAuley, D.: Breath control of amusement rides. In: 29th International Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (2011) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones, K., Wills, J.: The invention of the park: from the Garden of Eden to Disney’s Magic Kingdom. Polity Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Solomon, S.: American playgrounds: Revitalizing community spaces. UPNE, New England (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Playground designers’ website,
  13. 13.
    Ladd, G., Price, J., Hart, C.: Predicting preschoolers’ peer status from their playground behaviors. Child Development 59(4), 986–992 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barbour, A.: The impact of playground design on the play behaviors of children with different levels of physical competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 14(1), 75–98 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sturm, J., Bekker, T., Groenendaal, B., Wesselink, R., Eggen, B.: Key issues for the successful design of an intelligent interactive playground. In: 7th International Conference on Interaction Design for Children (2008) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seitnger, S., Sylvan, E., Zuckerman, O., Popovic, M., Zuckerman, O.: A new playground experience: going digital? In: Alt. Chi at the 24th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2006) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pares, N., Durany, J., Carreras, A.: Massive flux design for an interactive water installation: WATER GAMES. In: 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (2005) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delbruck, T., Whatley, A., Douglas, R., Eng, K., Hepp, K., Verschure, P.: A tactile luminous floor for an interactive autonomous space. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 55, 433–443 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soler-Adillon, J., Pares, N.: Interactive slde: An interactive playground to promote physical activity and socialization of children. In: Alt. Chi at the 27th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2009) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Misund, G., Holone, H., Karlsen, J., Tolsby, H.: Chase and catch – simple as that? Old-fashioned fun of traditional playground games revitalized with location-aware mobile phones. In: 6th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment (2009) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Derakhshan, A., Hammer, F., Hautop Lund, H.: Adapting playgrounds for children’s play using ambient playware. In: IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2006) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blumer, H.: What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review 18, 3–10 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holloway, I.: Basic concepts for qualitative research. Wiley-Blackwell (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bowen, G.: Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(3) (2006) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Hemmings, T., Benford, S.: Finding a place for Ubicomp in the home. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 208–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N., Walker, B.: The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: 22nd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neustaedter, C., Bernheim Brush, A.: “LINC-ing” the family: the participatory design of an inkable family calendar. In: 24th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2006) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Learning Science Research Institute,
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Boyatzis, R.: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development, 1st edn. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., Rodden, T.: Temporal trajectories in shared interactive narratives. In: 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing systemsGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gaver, WW., Beaver, J., Benford, S.: Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: 21st Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Rennick Egglestone
    • 1
  • Brendan Walker
    • 2
  • Joe Marshall
    • 1
  • Steve Benford
    • 1
  • Derek McAuley
    • 1
  1. 1.Horizon Digital Economy Research, Sir Colin Campbell BuildingUniversity of Nottingham Innovation ParkNottinghamUK
  2. 2.AerialLondonUK

Personalised recommendations