Advertisement

Remote Usability Testing Using Eyetracking

  • Piotr Chynał
  • Jerzy M. Szymański
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6946)

Abstract

In the paper we present a low cost method of using eyetracking to perform remote usability tests on users. Remote usability testing enables to test users in their natural environment. Eyetracking is one of the most popular techniques for usability testing in the laboratory environment. We decided to try to use this technique in remote tests. We used standard web camera with freeware software. Our experiment showed that such method is not perfect, but it could be a good addition to the standard remote tests, and a foundation for further development.

Keywords

Eyetracking Usability Remote Usability Testing Human-Computer Interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Andreasen, M.S., Nielsen, H.V., Schrøder, S.O., Stage, J.: What Happened to Remote Usability Testing? An Empirical Study of Three Methods (20.03.2011), http://www.takebay.net/data/chi07/docs/p1405.pdf
  2. 2.
    Brush B., Ames M., Davis J.: A Comparison of Synchronous Remote and Local Usability Studies for an Expert Interface, http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/990000/986018/p1179-brush.pdf (21.03.2001)
  3. 3.
    Duchowski, A.T.: Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice, pp. 205–300. Springer-Verlag Ltd., London (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moha, N., Li, Q., Seffah, A., Michel, G.: Towards a Platform for Usability Remote Tests via Internet, http://www.ptidej.net/Members/mohanaou/paper/OZCHI2004/OZCHI2004_Moha.pdf (20.03.2011)
  5. 5.
    Mohamed, A.O., Perreira Da Silva, M., Courbolay, V.: A history of eye gaze tracking (2007), http://hal.archives-ou-vertes.fr/docs/00/21/59/67/PDF/Rapport_interne_1.pdf (12.03.2010)
  6. 6.
    Oztoprak, A., Erbug, C.: Field versus Laboratory Usability Testing: a First Comparison, http://www.aydinoztoprak.com/images/HFES_Oztoprak_.pdf (21.03.2011)
  7. 7.
    Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., Pavan, P.: Remote Usability Evaluations with Disabled People. In: CHI 2006 Proceedings, Montréal, Québec, Canada (2006), http://www-course.cs.york.ac.uk/rmh/p1133-petrie.pdf (20.03.2011)
  8. 8.
    Scholtz, J.: Adaptation of Traditional Usability Testing Methods for Remote Testing, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.21.2141&rep=rep1&type=pdf (21.03.2011)
  9. 9.
    Tullis, T., Fleischman, S., McNulty, M., Cianchette, C., Bergel, M.: An Empirical Compari-son of Lab and Remote Usability Testing of Web Sites, http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/RemoteVsLab.pdf

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piotr Chynał
    • 1
  • Jerzy M. Szymański
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations