Advertisement

Calls for Interaction: The More the Better? User Experience of 3D Carousel and Additional Interaction Techniques

  • S. Shyam Sundar
  • Saraswathi Bellur
  • Jeeyun Oh
  • Haiyan Jia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6949)

Abstract

We perform a user study to investigate the psychological consequences of adding interaction techniques to the interface. In a between-subjects experiment (N = 143), we explore how (i) variations in sheer number of interaction techniques and (ii) addition of a novel technique, i.e., 3D carousel, influence the volume of users’ actions, their memory, perceptions of interactivity, as well as their attitudes and behaviors toward a website. Power usage is examined as a potential moderator. First-cut findings from self-reports and log data indicate that the 3D carousel feature has a strong impact on user experience, both positive and negative. It also moderates the curvilinear effect of adding traditional interaction techniques to the interface.

Keywords

Interaction Techniques 3D carousel user experience user engagement 

References

  1. 1.
    Sundar, S.S.: Social psychology of interactivity in human-Website interaction. In: Joinson, A.N., McKenna, K.Y.A., Postmes, T., Reips, U.-D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, pp. 89–104. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bucy, E.P.: The debate. The Information Society 20(5), 371 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sundar, S.S., Kalyanaraman, S., Brown, J.: Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research 30, 30–59 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Björkskog, C., Jacucci, G., Lorentin, B., Gamberini, L.: Mobile implementation of a web 3D carousel with touch input. In: Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 1–4. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Zhai, S., Smith, B.A., Selker, T.: Improving Browsing Performance: A study of four input devices for scrolling and pointing tasks. In: Proc. of the 6th IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 286–292 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marathe, S.S., Sundar, S.S., Bijvank, M.N., van Vugt, H., Veldhuis, J.: Who are these power users anyway? Building a psychological profile. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalyanaraman, S., Sundar, S.S.: The psychological appeal of personalized online content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication 56, 110–132 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu, Y., Sundar, S.S.: Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Communication Research 37, 105–132 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, S., Poturalski, M., Vronay, D.: Designing a generalized 3D carousel view. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2017–2020. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Shyam Sundar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saraswathi Bellur
    • 1
  • Jeeyun Oh
    • 1
  • Haiyan Jia
    • 1
  1. 1.Media Effects Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations