Website Customization: Exploring a Tag-Based Approach in the Australian Banking Context

  • Rajinesh Ravendran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6949)


Description: Website customization is important to better fulfill the needs and wants of individual customers. Tags assigned to web resources are suitable to facilitate website customization.

Area: Website customization, online banking, tags.


Online Banking Customization Process Bill Payment Visual Information Retrieval Banking User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Durao, F., Dolog, P.: A personalized tag-based recommendation in social web systems. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Adaptation and Personalization for Web 2.0 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fung, T.: Banking with a personalized touch: Examining the impact of website customization on commitment. Electronic Commerce Research 9(4), 296–309 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassan-Montero, Y., Herrero-Solana, V.: Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. Paper presented at the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Information Sciences and Technologies, InSciT 2006, Mérida, Spain (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hiltunen, M., Heng, L., Helgesen, L.: Personalized Electronic Banking Services. In: Karat, C.-M., Blom, J.O., Karat, J. (eds.) Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce, pp. 119–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. Paper presented at the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Odense, Denmark (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen, J.: Personalization is Over-Rated (1998),
  7. 7.
    Panke, S., Gaiser, B.: With my head up in the clouds: using social tagging to organize knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(3), 318–349 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peppers, D., Rogers, M.: The one to one future: Building relationships on customer at a time. Currency Doubleday, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pierrakos, D., Paliouras, G., Papatheodorou, C., Spyropoulos, C.: Web usage mining as a tool for personalization: A survey. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13(4), 311–372 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qi Xin, M., Uddin, M.N., Geun-Sik, J.: The wordNet based semantic relationship between tags in folksonomies. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), Singapore (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahim, M.M., JieYing, L.: An empirical assessment of customer satisfaction with Internet Banking applications: An Australian experience. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Computers and Information Technology, ICCIT (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajinesh Ravendran
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustria

Personalised recommendations