Skip to main content

Measurement of Decision-Making Mechanism under Different Governance Context: Quantitative Analysis Based on Manufacturing Industry Enterprises in Zhejiang

  • Conference paper
  • 1167 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 105))

Abstract

This paper considers scientific designing of decision-making mechanism is the key to solve corporate social responsibility problems. It compares the B-C index and finds stakeholder contingent governance arrangements can achieve better internal balance of power. Quantitative research evaluates corporate decision-making mechanism and results show that the coordination effectiveness and decision effectiveness are significantly impacted by corporate governance arrangements; favorable executive power of corporate governance is also can ensure the interests protection of stakeholder; otherwise, the external market governance can be regarded as a strong supplement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ji, J., Lv, S.: The correlation of stakeholder satisfaction and corporate value. China Industrial Economy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, P., Ye, H., Xue, Y., Liu, R., Hou, H.: Cooperation game theory. Shanghai Jiaotong University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, R., Peter, R., Li, S.: Dynamic cooperation. China Market Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banzhaf, J.F.: Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis. Rutgers Law Review (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman, J.S.: Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act. In: Lieberman, B. (ed.) Social Choice. Gordon and Breach, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baumol, W.J.: Business Behaviour, Value and Growth. Macmillan, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marris, R.: The Economics Theory of Managerial Capitalism. Macmillan, London (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Willianmon, O.E.: The Economics Theory of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Y.: Manager agent behaviour research. Beijing University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, H., Jia, S.: Interest coordinating and governance balancing in the perspective of stakeholders. China Industrial Economy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qian, C. (2011). Measurement of Decision-Making Mechanism under Different Governance Context: Quantitative Analysis Based on Manufacturing Industry Enterprises in Zhejiang. In: Jin, D., Lin, S. (eds) Advances in Computer Science, Intelligent System and Environment. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23756-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23756-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23755-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23756-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics