Skip to main content

Assessing the Scholarly Impact of ImageCLEF

  • Conference paper
Book cover Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation (CLEF 2011)

Abstract

Systematic evaluation has an important place in information retrieval research starting with the Cranfield tests and currently with TREC (Text REtrieval Conference) and other evaluation campaigns. Such benchmarks are often mentioned to have an important impact in advancing a research field and making techniques comparable. Still, their exact impact is hard to measure. This paper aims at assessing the scholarly impact of the ImageCLEF image retrieval evaluation initiative. To this end, the papers in the proceedings published after each evaluation campaign and their citations are analysed using Scopus and Google Scholar. A significant impact of ImageCLEF could be shown through this bibliometric analysis. The differences between the employed analysis methods, each with its advantages and limitations, are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J.: Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74(2), 257–271 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cleverdon, C.W.: The evaluation of systems used in information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, vol. 1, pp. 687–698. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clough, P., Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Grubinger, M., Lehmann, T.M., Jensen, J., Hersh, W.R.: The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Gey, F.C., Gonzalo, J., Müller, H., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B., de Rijke, M., Giampiccolo, D. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 535–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. A.-W. Harzing. Citation analysis across disciplines: The impact of different data sources and citation metrics (2010), http://www.harzing.com/data_metrics_comparison.htm (retrieved)

  5. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2010). IEEE Computer Society, Instanbul (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacsó, P.: Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review 30(3), 297–309 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacsó, P.: The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Information Review 32(3), 437–452 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.): ImageCLEF: Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahm, E., Thor, A.: Citation analysis of database publications. SIGMOD Record 34, 48–53 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rowe, B.R., Wood, D.W., Link, A.N., Simoni, D.A.: Economic impact assessment of NIST’s Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) Program. Technical Report Project Number 0211875, RTI International (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanderson, M.: Test collection based evaluation of information retrieval systems. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 4, 247–375 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Thornley, C.V., Johnson, A.C., Smeaton, A.F., Lee, H.: The scholarly impact of TRECVid (2003–2009). JASIST 62(4), 613–627 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ünay, D., Çataltepe, Z., Aksoy, S. (eds.): Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Recognizing Patterns in Signals, Speech, Images, and Videos, ICPR Contest Reports. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsikrika, T., de Herrera, A.G.S., Müller, H. (2011). Assessing the Scholarly Impact of ImageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds) Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation. CLEF 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6941. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23708-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23708-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23707-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23708-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics