Skip to main content

Self-Similarity Measure for Assessment of Image Visual Quality

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems (ACIVS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6915))

Abstract

An opportunity of using self-similarity in evaluation of image visual quality is considered. A method for estimating self-similarity for a given image fragment that takes into account contrast sensitivity function is proposed. Analytical expressions for describing the proposed parameter distribution are derived, and their importance to human vision system based image visual quality full-reference evaluation is proven. A corresponding metric is calculated and a mean squared difference for the considered parameter maps in distorted and reference images is considered. Correlation between this metric and mean opinion score (MOS) for five largest openly available specialized image databases is calculated. It is demonstrated that the proposed metric provides a correlation at the level of the best known metrics of visual quality. This, in turn, shows an importance of fragment self-similarity in image perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keelan, B.W.: Handbook of Image Quality. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponomarenko, N., Krivenko, S., Lukin, V., Egiazarian, K.: Lossy Compression of Noisy Images Based on Visual Quality: A Comprehensive Study. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 13 (2010), doi:10.1155/2010/976436

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carli, M.: Perceptual Aspects in Data Hiding. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Technology, Tampere University of Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fevralev, D., Lukin, V., Ponomarenko, N., Abramov, S., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J.: Efficiency analysis of DCT-based filters for color image database. In: Proceedings of SPIE Conference Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems VII, San Francisco, vol. 7870 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: TID2008 - A Database for Evaluation of Full-Reference Visual Quality Assessment Metrics. In: Advances of Modern Radioelectronics, vol. 10, pp. 30–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15(11), 3441–3452 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, pp. 1398–1402 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watson, A.B., Solomon, J.A.: Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(9), 2379–2391 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C., Cormack, L.K.: No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(11), 1918–1927 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponomarenko, N., Eremeev, O., Egiazarian, K., Lukin, V.: Statistical evaluation of no-reference image visual quality metrics. In: Proceedings of EUVIP, Paris, p. 5 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ponomarenko, N., Silvestri, F., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Astola, J., Lukin, V.: On between-coefficient contrast masking of DCT basis functions. In: Proc. of the Third International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics, USA, p. 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace, G.K.: The JPEG Still Picture Compression Standard. Comm. of the ACM 34, 30–44 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponomarenko, N.N., Lukin, V.V., Egiazarian, K.O., Astola, J.T.: A method for blind estimation of spatially correlated noise characteristics. In: Proceedings of SPIE Conference Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems VII, San Jose, p. 12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N., Nagaraja, H.N.: A First Course in Order Statistics. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, NY (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mannos, J.L., Sakrison, D.J.: The Effects of a Visual Fidelity Criterion on the Encoding of Images. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 20(4), 525–535 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. MSDDM metric page, http://ponomarenko.info/msddm.htm

  18. Ninassi, A., Le Callet, P., Autrusseau, F.: Pseudo No Reference image quality metric using perceptual data hiding. In: SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, San Jose, vol. 6057-08 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Larson, E.C., Chandler, D.M.: Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of Electronic Imaging 19(1), 011006 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horita, Y., Kawayoke, Y., Parvez Sazzad, Z.M.: Image quality evaluation database (2011), http://160.26.142.130/toyama_database.zip

  21. Kendall, M.G.: The advanced theory of statistics, vol. 1, p. 457. Charles Griffin & Company limited, London (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.: A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9, 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Damera-Venkata, N., Kite, T., Geisler, W., Evans, B., Bovik, A.: Image Quality Assessment Based on a Degradation Model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9, 636–650 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murthy, A.V., Karam, L.J.: A MATLAB Based Framework For Image and Video Quality Evaluation. In: International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 242–247 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ponomarenko, N., Jin, L., Lukin, V., Egiazarian, K. (2011). Self-Similarity Measure for Assessment of Image Visual Quality. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Kleihorst, R., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds) Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. ACIVS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6915. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23687-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23687-7_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23686-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23687-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics